Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773484›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Development, comparison, and internal validation of prediction models to determine the visual prognosis of patients with open globe injuries using machine learning approaches.

Mehrdad Motamed Shariati, Saeid Eslami, Nasser Shoeibi, Alireza Eslampoor, Mohammadreza Sedaghat, Hamid Gharaei, Siamak Zarei-Ghanavati, Akbar Derakhshan, Majid Abrishami, Mojtaba Abrishami and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mehrdad Motamed ShariatiEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Saeid EslamiDepartment of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Nasser ShoeibiEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Alireza EslampoorEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammadreza SedaghatEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Hamid GharaeiEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Siamak Zarei-GhanavatiEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Akbar DerakhshanEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Majid AbrishamiEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mojtaba AbrishamiEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Seyedeh Maryam HosseiniEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Saeed Shokuhi RadEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammadreza Ansari AstanehEye Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Raheleh Mahboub FarimaniDepartment of Medical Informatics, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. raahimah60@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOpen globe injuries (OGI) represent a main preventable reason for blindness and visual impairment, particularly in developing countries. The goal of this study is evaluating key variables affecting the prognosis of open globe injuries and validating internally and comparing different machine learning models to estimate final visual acuity. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe reviewed three hundred patients with open globe injuries receiving treatment at Khatam-Al-Anbia Hospital in Iran from 2020 to 2022. Age, sex, type of trauma, initial VA grade, relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD), zone of trauma, traumatic cataract, traumatic optic neuropathy (TON), intraocular foreign body (IOFB), retinal detachment (RD), endophthalmitis, and ocular trauma score (OTS) grade were the input features. We calculated univariate and multivariate regression models to assess the association of different features with visual acuity (VA) outcomes. We predicted visual acuity using ten supervised machine learning algorithms including multinomial logistic regression (MLR), support vector machines (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), naïve bayes (NB), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), bagging (BG), adaptive boosting (ADA), artificial neural networks (ANN), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). Accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), recall, F-score, brier score (BS), Matthew correlation coefficient (MCC), receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC), and calibration plot were used to assess how well machine learning algorithms performed in predicting the final VA.

resultsThe artificial neural network (ANN) model had the best accuracy to predict the final VA. The sensitivity, F1 score, PPV, accuracy, and MCC of the ANN model were 0.81, 0.85, 0.89, 0.93, and 0.81, respectively. In addition, the estimated AUC-ROC and AUR-PRC of the ANN model for OGI patients were 0.96 and 0.91, respectively. The brier score and calibration log-loss for the ANN model was 0.201 and 0.232, respectively.

conclusionAs classic and ensemble ML models were compared, results shows that the ANN model was the best. As a result, the framework that has been presented may be regarded as a good substitute for predicting the final VA in OGI patients. Excellent predictive accuracy was shown by the open globe injury model developed in this study, which should be helpful to provide clinical advice to patients and making clinical decisions concerning the management of open globe injuries.

Indexed as

Eye Injuries, PenetratingMachine LearningVisual AcuityAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPrognosisYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMulti-class classificationOpen globe injuryVariables predictive of visual and surgical outcomesVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID38773484
PMCPMC11106970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.