Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773473›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

Professional identity work of nurse practitioners and family physicians in primary care in Quebec and Ontario - a study protocol.

Charo Rodríguez, Douglas Archibald, Roland Grad, Katya Loban, Kelley Kilpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charo RodríguezDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 5858 Côte-des-Neiges Road, 3rd floor, suite 300, room 328, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada. charo.rodriguez@mcgill.ca.
Douglas ArchibaldDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Roland GradDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, 5858 Côte-des-Neiges Road, 3rd floor, suite 300, room 328, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada.
Katya LobanResearch Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kelley KilpatrickIngram School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSolo medical practices in primary healthcare delivery have been abandoned in favor of interdisciplinary teamwork in most Western countries. Dynamics in interdisciplinary teams might however be particularly difficult when two or more autonomous health professionals develop similar roles at the practice level. This is the case of family physicians (FPs) and nurse practitioners (NPs), due to the fact that the latter might accomplish not only the traditional role proper to a nurse, but also several medical activities such as requesting diagnostic exams and prescribing medical treatments. The tensions that this overlap might generate and their implications in regard of the development of professional identities, and consequently of the quality of health care delivered, have been suggested, but rarely examined empirically. The goal of this study is to examine identity work, i.e., the processes of (re)construction of professional identities, of NPs and FPs working together in primary care interdisciplinary teams.

methodsA longitudinal, interpretive, and comparative multiple (n = 2) case study is proposed. Identity work theory in organizations is adopted as theoretical perspective. Cases are urban primary care multidisciplinary teams from two different Canadian provinces: Quebec and Ontario. Participants are NPs, FPs, managers, and patients. Data gathering involves audio-diaries, individual semi-structured and focus group interviews, observations, and archival material. Narrative and metaphor techniques are adopted for analyzing data collected. Within- and cross-case analysis will be performed. DISCUSSION: For practice, the results of this investigation will: (a) be instrumental for clinicians, primary care managers, and policy decision-makers responsible for the implementation of interdisciplinary teamwork in primary healthcare delivery to improve decision-making processes and primary care team performance over time; (b) inform continuing interdisciplinary professional development educational initiatives that support competency in health professionals' identity construction in interdisciplinary primary care organizations. For research, the project will contribute to enriching theory about identity construction dynamics in health professions, both in the fields of health services and primary care education research.

Indexed as

Nurse PractitionersPhysicians, FamilyPrimary Health CareHumansLongitudinal StudiesOntarioPatient Care TeamQuebecSocial IdentificationFamily medicineInterdisciplinary primary health careNursingProfessional identity

Identifiers

PMID38773473
PMCPMC11107061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.