Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773464›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Machine learning models on a web application to predict short-term postoperative outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Mert Karabacak, Abhiraj D Bhimani, Alexander J Schupper, Matthew T Carr, Jeremy Steinberger, Konstantinos Margetis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Timing and predictors of in-hospital mortality after cervical fusion: A National Inpatient Sample study from 2016 to 2022.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mert KarabacakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Abhiraj D BhimaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Alexander J SchupperDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Matthew T CarrDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Jeremy SteinbergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Konstantinos MargetisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Health System, 1468 Madison Ave, New York, NY, 10029, USA. Konstantinos.Margetis@mountsinai.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe frequency of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has increased up to 400% since 2011, underscoring the need to preoperatively anticipate adverse postoperative outcomes given the procedure's expanding use. Our study aims to accomplish two goals: firstly, to develop a suite of explainable machine learning (ML) models capable of predicting adverse postoperative outcomes following ACDF surgery, and secondly, to embed these models in a user-friendly web application, demonstrating their potential utility.

methodsWe utilized data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who underwent ACDF surgery. The outcomes of interest were four short-term postoperative adverse outcomes: prolonged length of stay (LOS), non-home discharges, 30-day readmissions, and major complications. We utilized five ML algorithms - TabPFN, TabNET, XGBoost, LightGBM, and Random Forest - coupled with the Optuna optimization library for hyperparameter tuning. To bolster the interpretability of our models, we employed SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for evaluating predictor variables' relative importance and used partial dependence plots to illustrate the impact of individual variables on the predictions generated by our top-performing models. We visualized model performance using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and precision-recall curves (PRC). Quantitative metrics calculated were the area under the ROC curve (AUROC), balanced accuracy, weighted area under the PRC (AUPRC), weighted precision, and weighted recall. Models with the highest AUROC values were selected for inclusion in a web application.

resultsThe analysis included 57,760 patients for prolonged LOS [11.1% with prolonged LOS], 57,780 for non-home discharges [3.3% non-home discharges], 57,790 for 30-day readmissions [2.9% readmitted], and 57,800 for major complications [1.4% with major complications]. The top-performing models, which were the ones built with the Random Forest algorithm, yielded mean AUROCs of 0.776, 0.846, 0.775, and 0.747 for predicting prolonged LOS, non-home discharges, readmissions, and complications, respectively.

conclusionsOur study employs advanced ML methodologies to enhance the prediction of adverse postoperative outcomes following ACDF. We designed an accessible web application to integrate these models into clinical practice. Our findings affirm that ML tools serve as vital supplements in risk stratification, facilitating the prediction of diverse outcomes and enhancing patient counseling for ACDF.

Indexed as

Cervical VertebraeDiskectomyInternetMachine LearningPostoperative ComplicationsSpinal FusionAdultAgedDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionTreatment OutcomeACDFArtificial intelligenceMachine learningOutcome predictionPersonalized medicinePrecision medicineSpine surgeryWeb application

Identifiers

PMID38773464
PMCPMC11110429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.