Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773456›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024

Automatic segmentation of 15 critical anatomical labels and measurements of cardiac axis and cardiothoracic ratio in fetal four chambers using nnU-NetV2.

Bocheng Liang, Fengfeng Peng, Dandan Luo, Qing Zeng, Huaxuan Wen, Bowen Zheng, Zhiying Zou, Liting An, Huiying Wen, Xin Wen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bocheng LiangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China.
Fengfeng PengDepartment of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Dandan LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China.
Qing ZengDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China.
Huaxuan WenDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China.
Bowen ZhengDepartment of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, 410082, China.
Zhiying ZouDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China.
Liting AnDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China.
Huiying WenDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China.
Xin WenDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China.
Yimei LiaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China.
Ying YuanDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China.
Shengli LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity&Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, 518028, China. lishengli63@126.com.

Funding

Guangdong Yiyang Healthcare Charity Foundation 2023CSM005National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFF0606301National Natural Science Foundation of China 62227808Shenzhen Science and Technology Program JCYJ20210324130812035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate segmentation of critical anatomical structures in fetal four-chamber view images is essential for the early detection of congenital heart defects. Current prenatal screening methods rely on manual measurements, which are time-consuming and prone to inter-observer variability. This study develops an AI-based model using the state-of-the-art nnU-NetV2 architecture for automatic segmentation and measurement of key anatomical structures in fetal four-chamber view images.

methodsA dataset, consisting of 1,083 high-quality fetal four-chamber view images, was annotated with 15 critical anatomical labels and divided into training/validation (867 images) and test (216 images) sets. An AI-based model using the nnU-NetV2 architecture was trained on the annotated images and evaluated using the mean Dice coefficient (mDice) and mean intersection over union (mIoU) metrics. The model's performance in automatically computing the cardiac axis (CAx) and cardiothoracic ratio (CTR) was compared with measurements from sonographers with varying levels of experience.

resultsThe AI-based model achieved a mDice coefficient of 87.11% and an mIoU of 77.68% for the segmentation of critical anatomical structures. The model's automated CAx and CTR measurements showed strong agreement with those of experienced sonographers, with respective intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of 0.83 and 0.81. Bland-Altman analysis further confirmed the high agreement between the model and experienced sonographers.

conclusionWe developed an AI-based model using the nnU-NetV2 architecture for accurate segmentation and automated measurement of critical anatomical structures in fetal four-chamber view images. Our model demonstrated high segmentation accuracy and strong agreement with experienced sonographers in computing clinically relevant parameters. This approach has the potential to improve the efficiency and reliability of prenatal cardiac screening, ultimately contributing to the early detection of congenital heart defects.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalUltrasonography, PrenatalFemaleFetal HeartHumansPregnancyDeep learningFetalFour-chamber viewUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38773456
PMCPMC11106923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.