Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773398›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

The impact of early weight-bearing on results following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Sehmuz Kaya, Yunus Can Unal, Necip Guven, Can Ozcan, Abdulrahim Dundar, Tulin Turkozu, Sezai Ozkan, Cihan Adanas, Mehmet Ata Gokalp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sehmuz KayaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey. sehmuzkaya@doctor.com.
Yunus Can UnalDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.
Necip GuvenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.
Can OzcanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Orhaneli State Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Abdulrahim DundarDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
Tulin TurkozuDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.
Sezai OzkanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.
Cihan AdanasDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.
Mehmet Ata GokalpDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures are common injuries that typically affect young, physically active individuals and may require surgical reconstruction. Studies have shown that the long time success of ACL reconstruction depends on the surgical technique and the postoperative rehabilitation strategy. However, there is still no consensus on the content of rehabilitation programs. Hence, additional research is required to elucidate the significance of early weight-bearing in the rehabilitation process following ACL reconstruction. The aim of this article is to examine the impact of weight-bearing on the clinical results of ACL reconstruction. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patient records who had undergone arthroscopic reconstruction using a semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture between January 2018 and December 2020. The study included the data of 110 patients. The patients were split into two groups: Group 1 underwent early weight-bearing, while Group 2 followed a non-weight-bearing regimen for three weeks. We assessed the patients using the anterior drawer test, Lachman test, range of motion, Lysholm knee scale, Cincinnati scale, Tegner scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form and clinical records. Analytical tests were conducted to compare the results.

resultsThe complication rates did not show a significant difference between the groups. Group 1 had higher frequencies of positive anterior drawer and Lachman tests. The Lysholm and Cincinnati knee scores of patients in Group 1 were notably lower than those of patients in Group 2. Additionally, the Tegner activity scores and IKDC scores of patients in Group 1 were also meaningfully lower than those of patients in Group 2. In Group 1 patients, there was no notable relationship observed between body mass index (BMI) and the results of the anterior drawer test (ADT) or Lachman test. However, patients with a BMI of 25 or higher in Group 1 showed a decrease in postoperative IKDC scores. In Group 2 patients, no significant relationship was identified between BMI and either the ADT or the Lachman test outcome.

conclusionBased on current literature and current rehabilitation guidelines following ACL reconstruction, the decision to initiate early weight-bearing is based on a limited number of studies with low levels of evidence. In our study, we found that patients who followed a non-weight-bearing regimen for 3 weeks after surgery had better mid-term results than those who were allowed to bear weight early. It appears that further prospective studies on this topic are needed to update rehabilitation guidelines in the next.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionWeight-BearingAdolescentAdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentArthroscopyFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnterior cruciate ligamentArthroscopic reconstructionBody mass indexEarly weight bearingRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID38773398
PMCPMC11106972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.