Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773391›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

Refining neural network algorithms for accurate brain tumor classification in MRI imagery.

Asma Alshuhail, Arastu Thakur, R Chandramma, T R Mahesh, Ahlam Almusharraf, V Vinoth Kumar, Surbhi Bhatia Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Asma AlshuhailDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer Sciences and Information Technology, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia.
Arastu ThakurDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bangalore, 562112, India.
R ChandrammaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering (AI & ML), Global Academy of Technology, Bangalore, India.
T R MaheshDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bangalore, 562112, India.
Ahlam AlmusharrafDepartment of Management, College of Business Administration, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia. aialmusharraf@pnu.edu.sa.
V Vinoth KumarSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632001, India.
Surbhi Bhatia KhanSchool of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor diagnosis using MRI scans poses significant challenges due to the complex nature of tumor appearances and variations. Traditional methods often require extensive manual intervention and are prone to human error, leading to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. Current approaches primarily include manual examination by radiologists and conventional machine learning techniques. These methods rely heavily on feature extraction and classification algorithms, which may not capture the intricate patterns present in brain MRI images. Conventional techniques often suffer from limited accuracy and generalizability, mainly due to the high variability in tumor appearance and the subjective nature of manual interpretation. Additionally, traditional machine learning models may struggle with the high-dimensional data inherent in MRI images. To address these limitations, our research introduces a deep learning-based model utilizing convolutional neural networks (CNNs).Our model employs a sequential CNN architecture with multiple convolutional, max-pooling, and dropout layers, followed by dense layers for classification. The proposed model demonstrates a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy, achieving an overall accuracy of 98% on the test dataset. The proposed model demonstrates a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy, achieving an overall accuracy of 98% on the test dataset. The precision, recall, and F1-scores ranging from 97 to 98% with a roc-auc ranging from 99 to 100% for each tumor category further substantiate the model's effectiveness. Additionally, the utilization of Grad-CAM visualizations provides insights into the model's decision-making process, enhancing interpretability. This research addresses the pressing need for enhanced diagnostic accuracy in identifying brain tumors through MRI imaging, tackling challenges such as variability in tumor appearance and the need for rapid, reliable diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleBrain tumor detectionConvolutional neural networksDataset analysisDeep learningGrad-CAM visualizationImage classificationMachine learningMedical imagingMRI images

Identifiers

PMID38773391
PMCPMC11110259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.