ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Refining neural network algorithms for accurate brain tumor classification in MRI imagery.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- CAE-BrainNet: a statistically validated class-adaptive attention ensemble model for explainable brain tumor classification from MRI.Brain informatics · 2026Article
- Explainable AI in Cancer Imaging: Scoping Review of Methods, Modalities, and Clinical Integration.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Dmcie: Diffusion model with concatenation of inputs and errors for enhanced brain tumor segmentation in MRI images.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Gastrointestinal Tract: Morphology, WHO 2022 Grading, and Prognostic Perspectives.Cureus · 2026Review
- A deep learning based NeuroFusionNet approach for automated brain tumor diagnosis from MRI.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Multimodal deep learning outperforms clinical and brain region models in predicting stroke-associated pneumonia: an explainable AI study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- XcepFusion for brain tumor detection using a hybrid transfer learning framework with layer pruning and freezing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multiparametric MRI characteristics for differentiating primary cancer origin in brain metastases.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- A deep ensemble learning framework for brain tumor classification using data balancing and fine-tuning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CausalX-Net: a causality-guided explainable segmentation network for brain tumors.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- The Neural Frontier of Future Medical Imaging: A Review of Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Detection.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
- Enhancing image-based diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract diseases through deep learning with EfficientNet and advanced data augmentation techniques.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- A QR code-enabled framework for fast biomedical image processing in medical diagnosis using deep learning.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumor diagnosis using MRI scans poses significant challenges due to the complex nature of tumor appearances and variations. Traditional methods often require extensive manual intervention and are prone to human error, leading to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. Current approaches primarily include manual examination by radiologists and conventional machine learning techniques. These methods rely heavily on feature extraction and classification algorithms, which may not capture the intricate patterns present in brain MRI images. Conventional techniques often suffer from limited accuracy and generalizability, mainly due to the high variability in tumor appearance and the subjective nature of manual interpretation. Additionally, traditional machine learning models may struggle with the high-dimensional data inherent in MRI images. To address these limitations, our research introduces a deep learning-based model utilizing convolutional neural networks (CNNs).Our model employs a sequential CNN architecture with multiple convolutional, max-pooling, and dropout layers, followed by dense layers for classification. The proposed model demonstrates a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy, achieving an overall accuracy of 98% on the test dataset. The proposed model demonstrates a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy, achieving an overall accuracy of 98% on the test dataset. The precision, recall, and F1-scores ranging from 97 to 98% with a roc-auc ranging from 99 to 100% for each tumor category further substantiate the model's effectiveness. Additionally, the utilization of Grad-CAM visualizations provides insights into the model's decision-making process, enhancing interpretability. This research addresses the pressing need for enhanced diagnostic accuracy in identifying brain tumors through MRI imaging, tackling challenges such as variability in tumor appearance and the need for rapid, reliable diagnostic tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.