Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773363›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2024

Improving selection decisions with mating information by accounting for Mendelian sampling variances looking two generations ahead.

Tobias A M Niehoff, Jan Ten Napel, Piter Bijma, Torsten Pook, Yvonne C J Wientjes, Bernadett Hegedűs, Mario P L Calus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Practical Considerations When Using Mendelian Sampling Variances for Selection Decisions in Genomic Selection Programs.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tobias A M NiehoffAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6700AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Tobias.niehoff@wur.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3046-6699
Jan Ten NapelAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6700AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-9080
Piter BijmaAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6700AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9005-9131
Torsten PookAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6700AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7874-8500
Yvonne C J WientjesAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6700AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0681-2902
Bernadett HegedűsAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6700AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3511-8111
Mario P L CalusAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6700AH, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3213-704X

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (TKI Agri & Food Project LWV20054) and the Breed4Food partners Cobb Europe (Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom), CRV (Arnhem, the Netherlands), Hendrix Genetics (Boxmeer, the Net Food Project LWV20054This study was financially supported by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (TKI Agri & Food Project LWV20054) and the Breed4Food partners Cobb Europe (Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom), CRV (Arnhem, the Netherlands), Hendrix Genetics (Boxmeer, the Net TKI Agri
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreeding programs are judged by the genetic level of animals that are used to disseminate genetic progress. These animals are typically the best ones of the population. To maximise the genetic level of very good animals in the next generation, parents that are more likely to produce top performing offspring need to be selected. The ability of individuals to produce high-performing progeny differs because of differences in their breeding values and gametic variances. Differences in gametic variances among individuals are caused by differences in heterozygosity and linkage. The use of the gametic Mendelian sampling variance has been proposed before, for use in the usefulness criterion or Index5, and in this work, we extend existing approaches by not only considering the gametic Mendelian sampling variance of individuals, but also of their potential offspring. Thus, the criteria developed in this study plan one additional generation ahead. For simplicity, we assumed that the true quantitative trait loci (QTL) effects, genetic map and the haplotypes of all animals are known.

resultsIn this study, we propose a new selection criterion, ExpBVSelGrOff, which describes the genetic level of selected grand-offspring that are produced by selected offspring of a particular mating. We compare our criterion with other published criteria in a stochastic simulation of an ongoing breeding program for 21 generations for proof of concept. ExpBVSelGrOff performed better than all other tested criteria, like the usefulness criterion or Index5 which have been proposed in the literature, without compromising short-term gains. After only five generations, when selection is strong (1%), selection based on ExpBVSelGrOff achieved 5.8% more commercial genetic gain and retained 25% more genetic variance without compromising inbreeding rate compared to selection based only on breeding values.

conclusionsOur proposed selection criterion offers a new tool to accelerate genetic progress for contemporary genomic breeding programs. It retains more genetic variance than previously published criteria that plan less far ahead. Considering future gametic Mendelian sampling variances in the selection process also seems promising for maintaining more genetic variance.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociSelection, GeneticAnimalsBreedingFemaleMaleSelective Breeding

Identifiers

PMID38773363
PMCPMC11107025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.