Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773301›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Belief inference for hierarchical hidden states in spatial navigation.

Risa Katayama, Ryo Shiraki, Shin Ishii, Wako Yoshida

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Risa KatayamaGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan. katayama.risa.8d@kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-7217-3096
Ryo ShirakiGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Shin IshiiGraduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
Wako YoshidaDepartment of Neural Computation for Decision-Making, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, 619-0288, Japan.

Funding

DH | National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) NIHR203316MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) JPMJFS2123MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 22H04998MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 23H04676New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) P20006RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/W027593/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 203139/A/16/ZWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncertainty abounds in the real world, and in environments with multiple layers of unobservable hidden states, decision-making requires resolving uncertainties based on mutual inference. Focusing on a spatial navigation problem, we develop a Tiger maze task that involved simultaneously inferring the local hidden state and the global hidden state from probabilistically uncertain observation. We adopt a Bayesian computational approach by proposing a hierarchical inference model. Applying this to human task behaviour, alongside functional magnetic resonance brain imaging, allows us to separate the neural correlates associated with reinforcement and reassessment of belief in hidden states. The imaging results also suggest that different layers of uncertainty differentially involve the basal ganglia and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, and that the regions responsible are organised along the rostral axis of these areas according to the type of inference and the level of abstraction of the hidden state, i.e. higher-order state inference involves more anterior parts.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpatial NavigationAdultBrainBrain MappingDecision MakingFemaleHumansMalePrefrontal CortexUncertaintyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38773301
PMCPMC11109253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.