Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773274›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Enhanced multi-class pathology lesion detection in gastric neoplasms using deep learning-based approach and validation.

Byeong Soo Kim, Bokyung Kim, Minwoo Cho, Hyunsoo Chung, Ji Kon Ryu, Sungwan Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Byeong Soo Kim *Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Graduate School, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Korea.
Bokyung Kim *Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, 07061, Korea.
Minwoo ChoTransdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
Hyunsoo ChungDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
Ji Kon RyuDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea. jkryu@snu.ac.kr.
Sungwan KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03080, Korea. sungwan@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korean government (the Ministry of Science and ICT, the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) 1711179421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study developed a new convolutional neural network model to detect and classify gastric lesions as malignant, premalignant, and benign. We used 10,181 white-light endoscopy images from 2606 patients in an 8:1:1 ratio. Lesions were categorized as early gastric cancer (EGC), advanced gastric cancer (AGC), gastric dysplasia, benign gastric ulcer (BGU), benign polyp, and benign erosion. We assessed the lesion detection and classification model using six-class, cancer versus non-cancer, and neoplasm versus non-neoplasm categories, as well as T-stage estimation in cancer lesions (T1, T2-T4). The lesion detection rate was 95.22% (219/230 patients) on a per-patient basis: 100% for EGC, 97.22% for AGC, 96.49% for dysplasia, 75.00% for BGU, 97.22% for benign polyps, and 80.49% for benign erosion. The six-class category exhibited an accuracy of 73.43%, sensitivity of 80.90%, specificity of 83.32%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 73.68%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.53%. The sensitivity and NPV were 78.62% and 88.57% for the cancer versus non-cancer category, and 83.26% and 89.80% for the neoplasm versus non-neoplasm category, respectively. The T stage estimation model achieved an accuracy of 85.17%, sensitivity of 88.68%, specificity of 79.81%, PPV of 87.04%, and NPV of 82.18%. The novel CNN-based model remarkably detected and classified malignant, premalignant, and benign gastric lesions and accurately estimated gastric cancer T-stages.

Indexed as

Deep LearningStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerSensitivity and SpecificityConvolutional neural networksEndoscopyGastric cancerMalignancy

Identifiers

PMID38773274
PMCPMC11109266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.