Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773258›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Combination of proton- or X-irradiation with anti-PDL1 immunotherapy in two murine oral cancers.

Anne Marit Rykkelid, Priyanshu Manojkumar Sinha, Charlemagne Asonganyi Folefac, Michael R Horsman, Brita Singers Sørensen, Tine Merete Søland, Olaf Joseph Franciscus Schreurs, Eirik Malinen, Nina Frederike J Edin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne Marit RykkelidDepartment of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048, 0316, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Priyanshu Manojkumar SinhaExperimental Clinical Oncology - Dept. Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Charlemagne Asonganyi FolefacExperimental Clinical Oncology - Dept. Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Michael R HorsmanExperimental Clinical Oncology - Dept. Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Brita Singers SørensenDanish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Tine Merete SølandInstitute of Oral Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1052, 0316, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Olaf Joseph Franciscus SchreursInstitute of Oral Biology, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1052, 0316, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Eirik MalinenDepartment of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048, 0316, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
Nina Frederike J EdinDepartment of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048, 0316, Blindern, Oslo, Norway. n.f.j.edin@fys.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6995-131X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combining radiation therapy with immunotherapy is a strategy to improve both treatments. The purpose of this study was to compare responses for two syngeneic head and neck cancer (HNC) tumor models in mice following X-ray or proton irradiation with or without immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). MOC1 (immunogenic) and MOC2 (less immunogenic) tumors were inoculated in the right hind leg of each mouse (C57BL/6J, n = 398). Mice were injected with anti-PDL1 (10 mg/kg, twice weekly for 2 weeks), and tumors were treated with single-dose irradiation (5-30 Gy) with X-rays or protons. MOC2 tumors grew faster and were more radioresistant than MOC1 tumors, and all mice with MOC2 tumors developed metastases. Irradiation reduced the tumor volume in a dose-dependent manner. ICI alone reduced the tumor volume for MOC1 with 20% compared to controls, while no reduction was seen for MOC2. For MOC1, there was a clear treatment synergy when combining irradiation with ICI for radiation doses above 5 Gy and there was a tendency for X-rays being slightly more biologically effective compared to protons. For MOC2, there was a tendency of protons being more effective than X-rays, but both radiation types showed a small synergy when combined with ICI. Although the responses and magnitudes of the therapeutic effect varied, the optimal radiation dose for maximal synergy appeared to be in the order of 10-15 Gy, regardless of tumor model.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyProton TherapyAnimalsB7-H1 AntigenCell Line, TumorCombined Modality TherapyDisease Models, AnimalFemaleImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMouth NeoplasmsX-RaysX-Ray TherapyB7-H1 AntigenCd274 protein, mouseImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38773258
PMCPMC11109162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.