ArticleScientific reports2024
Medial sigmoid depression prevalence and association with a sigmoid notch: cone beam computed tomography and panoramic image study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of artifacts in cone-beam computed tomography from different intraradicular pins and cementation materials using different exposure protocols.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to determine whether and how the data of the medial sigmoid depression (MSD) area via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) differs from panoramic radiography. This study also aims to evaluate various sigmoid notch types and assess the relationship between sigmoid depression and notch morphology. A total of 129 individuals consisting of 258 sides were evaluated. Chi-Square/Fisher Exact tests were used to assess parameters on a categorical scale between two or more groups. McNemar's test compared the findings detected on panoramic and CBCT images. MSD was more prevalent in females than males in both techniques, but this difference was not statistically significant. There was no association between the prevalence of MSD and the morphology of the sigmoid notch. The incidence of MSD shape was not significantly different between both imaging modalities. In both panoramic and CBCT, we found a high and similar prevalence of MSD. While the MSD prevalence was 66.7% for CBCT, it was 58.1% for panoramic. The shape or prevalence of MSDs in either approach did not correlate with sigmoid notch morphology. The two approaches' identical prevalence indicates that the panoramic image has adequately defines MSD. The high prevalence of MSD demonstrated how important it is for clinicians to characterize this anatomical variation accurately for the surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.