Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773162›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Utility of TTR-INR guided warfarin adjustment protocol to improve time in therapeutic range in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving warfarin.

Paisit Kosum, Noppachai Siranart, Kunathip Nissaipan, Wattakorn Laohapiboolrattana, Walit Sowalertrat, Kanittha Triamamornwooth, Rawiwan Arunphan, Apiradee Sriyom, Voravut Rungpradubvong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paisit Kosum *Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Noppachai Siranart *Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. siranartnoppachai@gmail.com.
Kunathip NissaipanClinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenomics Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wattakorn LaohapiboolrattanaDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.
Walit SowalertratFaculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kanittha TriamamornwoothWarfarin Clinic, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rawiwan ArunphanWarfarin Clinic, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Apiradee SriyomWarfarin Clinic, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Voravut RungpradubvongDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. voravut.r@chula.ac.th.ORCID 0000-0002-3661-1490

Funding

The Ratchadapiseksompotch Fund (2021), Chulalongkorn University RA 64/025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Warfarin remains the most prescribed oral anticoagulant of choice in atrial fibrillation (AF) patient in resource-limited settings. Despite evidence linking Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) to patient outcomes, its use in clinical practice is not widespread. This prospective study explores the impact of a TTR-INR guided Warfarin adjustment protocol on TTR in AF patients. Conducted at the Warfarin clinic of King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal linear interpolation method at baseline, and then at 6 and 12 months post-protocol implementation. The primary outcome was the improvement in TTR following the protocol's implementation. The study analyzed 57 patients, with a mean age of 72 years and an even gender distribution. At baseline, 53% of patients had a TTR of less than 65%. However, TTR significantly improved from 65% at baseline to 80% after 12 months of protocol implementation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant increase in the proportion of patients with a TTR of 65% or more, from 47 to 88% (p < 0.001). During the follow-up period in the first 12 months, three patients died, but no ischemic or major bleeding events occurred. The significant improvement in TTR after 12 months of protocol implementation suggests that this strategy could provide additional value in improving TTR and outcomes in AF patients receiving Warfarin.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationInternational Normalized RatioWarfarinAgedAged, 80 and overDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsWarfarinAtrial fibrillation (AF)International normalized ratio (INR)Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs)Oral anticoagulants (OACs)Time in therapeutic range (TTR)Vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Identifiers

PMID38773162
PMCPMC11109105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.