Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773051›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2024

Dental management of long-term childhood cancer survivors: a systematic review.

K Seremidi, S Gizani, G Dahllöf, M Barr-Agholme, D Kloukos, G Tsilingaridis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Best clinical practise guidance for oral health care management of long-term childhood cancer survivors (CCS): an EAPD policy document.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dental caries in childhood cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

K SeremidiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4197-5827
S GizaniDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0701-6139
G DahllöfDivision of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 14104, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8536-5292
M Barr-AgholmeDivision of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 14104, Huddinge, Sweden.
D KloukosDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-238X
G TsilingaridisDivision of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 14104, Huddinge, Sweden. georgios.tsilingaridis@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-5840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCritically review and summarise existing knowledge on prevalence of oral, dental, and craniofacial side-effects of antineoplastic treatment in childhood cancer survivors (CCS).

methodsA literature search was conducted for studies reporting on children aged 4-19 years treated for any type of malignancy up to the age of 15 years and for whom, at the time of the examination, more than 8 months have elapsed since the end of treatment. Data regarding dental late effects on teeth and craniofacial complex were collected and mean prevalence of each defect was reported.

resultsFrom the 800 articles identified, 17 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included. A total of 983 CCS were examined, with the total number of healthy controls being 1266 children. Haematological malignancy was the most prevalent diagnosis with the age at diagnosis ranging between 0-15 years. Multiple antineoplastic protocols were implemented with the elapsed time being 8 months up to 17 years. One-third of CCS experienced at least one late effect, with corresponding value for the control group being below 25%. Among the defects identified clinically, microdontia, hypodontia and enamel developmental defects were recorded in 1/4 of CCS. Impaired root growth and agenesis were the two defects mostly recorded radiographically. The effect on dental maturity and on salivary glands was unclear.

conclusionCCS are at risk of developing dental late effects because of their disease and its treatment and therefore, routine periodic examinations are essential to record their development and provide comprehensive oral healthcare.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsAdolescentAntineoplastic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDental Care for Chronically IllHumansNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic treatmentChildhood cancer survivorsDental late effectsDental management

Identifiers

PMID38773051
PMCPMC11442565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.