Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773029›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

Optimal processing of surface facial EMG to identify emotional expressions: A data-driven approach.

J M Rutkowska, T Ghilardi, S V Vacaru, J E van Schaik, M Meyer, S Hunnius, R Oostenveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Facial Expressions as a Nexus for Health Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. The Effect of Hearsay on Speaker Commitment: An fEMG Study.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J M RutkowskaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
T GhilardiDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
S V VacaruVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J E van SchaikBehavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
M MeyerDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
S HunniusDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
R OostenveldDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. r.oostenveld@donders.ru.nl.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme H2020-MSCA-ITN-MOTION
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surface facial electromyography (EMG) is commonly used to detect emotions from subtle facial expressions. Although there are established procedures for collecting EMG data and some aspects of their processing, there is little agreement among researchers about the optimal way to process the EMG signal, so that the study-unrelated variability (noise) is removed, and the emotion-related variability is best detected. The aim of the current paper was to establish an optimal processing pipeline for EMG data for identifying emotional expressions in facial muscles. We identified the most common processing steps from existing literature and created 72 processing pipelines that represented all the different processing choices. We applied these pipelines to a previously published dataset from a facial mimicry experiment, where 100 adult participants observed happy and sad facial expressions, whilst the activity of their facial muscles, zygomaticus major and corrugator supercilii, was recorded with EMG. We used a resampling approach and subsets of the original data to investigate the effect and robustness of different processing choices on the performance of a logistic regression model that predicted the mimicked emotion (happy/sad) from the EMG signal. In addition, we used a random forest model to identify the most important processing steps for the sensitivity of the logistic regression model. Three processing steps were found to be most impactful: baseline correction, standardisation within muscles, and standardisation within subjects. The chosen feature of interest and the signal averaging had little influence on the sensitivity to the effect. We recommend an optimal processing pipeline, share our code and data, and provide a step-by-step walkthrough for researchers.

Indexed as

ElectromyographyEmotionsFacial ExpressionFacial MusclesAdultFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultEmotionFacial electromyographyMultiverseOptimal pipelineSurface electromyography

Identifiers

PMID38773029
PMCPMC11362446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.