ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024
Sex differences in Wake-Up Stroke patients characteristics and outcomes.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex Differences in Outcomes After Tenecteplase for Minor Stroke: A Subanalysis of the TEMPO-2 Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Nrsn1-Smarcc1 Coupling Regulates Neural Stem Cell Differentiation and Chronic-phase Recovery After Ischemic Stroke.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWake-up Stroke (WUS) accounts for about 25% of all ischemic strokes. Differences according to sex in the WUS subgroup has been poorly investigated so far, so we aimed to assess these differences by differentiating the enrolled population based on treatment administered. MATERIALS &
methodsWe retrospectively analysed clinical and imaging data of WUS patients admitted to our hospital between November 2013 and December 2018 dividing them in two groups: rTPA-treated and non-rTPA treated group. To point out outcome differences we evaluated: NIHSS at 7 days or at discharge, mRS at discharge and ΔNIHSS.
resultsWe enrolled 149 WUS patients, 74 rTPA treated and 75 non-rTPA treated. Among rTPA treated patients, time from last known well (LKW) to Emergency Department (ED) admission was longer in females than males (610 vs 454 min), while females had a higher ΔNIHSS than males (5 vs 3). Finally, among non-rTPA treated patients, females were older than males (85 vs 79 years), had a higher pre-admission mRS (although very low in both cases), had a longer length of stay (17 vs 13 days) and shown a higher NIHSS at discharge (4 vs 2) compared to males.
conclusionsFemales not receiving thrombolytic treatment had worse functional outcome than males, showing a higher NIHSS at discharge but, in contrast, when treated with rTPA they showed better neurological recovery as measured by a greater ΔNIHSS. We emphasize the importance of a prompt recognition of WUS in females since they seem to benefit more from rTPA treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38772977What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.