Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38772966›Full record

ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2024

Five-year follow-up of the iBerry Study: screening in early adolescence to identify those at risk of psychopathology in emerging adulthood.

D C Bouter, S J Ravensbergen, N G M de Neve-Enthoven, M Zarchev, C L Mulder, W J G Hoogendijk, S J Roza, ESPRi Consortium, N H Grootendorst-van Mil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

D C BouterDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
S J RavensbergenDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
N G M de Neve-EnthovenDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M ZarchevDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
C L MulderEpidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research Institute (ESPRi), Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
W J G HoogendijkDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
S J RozaDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
ESPRi Consortium
N H Grootendorst-van MilDepartment of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. n.grootendorst@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1085-5534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The iBerry Study, a Dutch population-based high-risk cohort (n = 1022) examines the transition from subclinical symptoms to psychiatric disorders in adolescents. Here, we present the first follow-up measurement, approximately 3 years after baseline assessment and 5 years after the screening based on self-reported emotional and behavioral problems (SDQ-Y). We give an update on the data collection, details on the (non)response, and the results on psychopathology outcomes. The first follow-up (2019-2022) had a response rate of 79% (n = 807). Our results at baseline (mean age 15.0 years) have shown the effectiveness of using the SDQ-Y to select a cohort oversampled for the risk of psychopathology. At first follow-up (mean age 18.1 years), the previously administered SDQ-Y remains predictive for selecting adolescents at risk. At follow-up, 47% of the high-risk adolescents showed significant mental health problems based on self- and parent reports and 46% of the high-risk adolescents met the criteria for multiple DSM-5 diagnoses. Compared to low-risk adolescents, high-risk adolescents had a sevenfold higher odds of significant emotional and behavioral problems at follow-up. Comprehensive assessment on psychopathology, substance abuse, psychotic symptoms, suicidality, nonsuicidal self-injury, addiction to social media and/or video gaming, and delinquency, as well as social development, and the utilization of healthcare and social services were conducted. This wave, as well as the ones to follow, track these adolescents into their young adulthood to identify risk factors, elucidate causal mechanisms, and discern pathways leading to both common and severe mental disorders. Results from the iBerry Study will provide leads for preventive interventions.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMass ScreeningNetherlandsPsychopathologyRisk FactorsSelf ReportYoung AdultAdolescentCohort studyEpidemiologyHigh-riskPsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID38772966
PMCPMC11618212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.