Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38772962›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2024

When is neoadjuvant chemotherapy indicated in rectal neuroendocrine tumors? An analysis of the National Cancer Database.

R Gefen, S H Emile, N Horesh, Z Garoufalia, M R Freund, S D Wexner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Rectal neuroendocrine tumors: Update.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R GefenEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
S H EmileEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
N HoreshEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
Z GaroufaliaEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
M R FreundEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA.
S D WexnerEllen Leifer Shulman and Steven Shulman Digestive Disease Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd., Weston, FL, 33331, USA. wexners@ccf.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNET) are rare and challenging to manage. While most patients with small rNET can be definitively treated with local excision, the role of chemotherapy in general and neoadjuvant therapy particularly in managing advanced rNET has not been well established. Therefore, this study aimed to determine which patients with rNET may gain a survival benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

methodsA retrospective cohort analysis of all patients who underwent surgical resection of rNET in the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004-2019) was performed. First, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of poor overall survival (OS) and define the high-risk groups. Afterward, stratified OS analyses were performed for each high-risk group to assess whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a survival benefit in each group.

resultsA total of 1837 patients (49.8% female; mean age 56.6 ± 12.3 years) underwent radical resection of a rNET. Tumors > 20 mm in size, clinical T4 tumors, poorly differentiated tumors, and metastatic disease were independent predictors of worse OS and were defined as high-risk groups. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not have a significant survival benefit in any of the high-risk groups, except for patients with high-grade rNETs where neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved OS to a mean of 30.9 months compared with 15.9 months when neoadjuvant therapy was not given (p = 0.006).

conclusionsNeoadjuvant chemotherapy improved the OS of patients with high-grade rNET by 15 months and may be indicated for this group.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualNeoadjuvant TherapyNeuroendocrine TumorsRectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesNational Cancer DatabaseNeoadjuvant chemotherapyRectal neuroendocrine tumorSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID38772962
PMCPMC11108916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.