ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Adrenal washout CT in patients with no history of cancer: a waste of time?
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pitfalls of Adrenal Washout on CT in the Adult Population: A Pictorial Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Washed up: the end of an era for adrenal incidentaloma CT.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Feasibility of extracellular volume fraction derived from single-phase spectral CT for differentiating between adrenal metastases and adenomas.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo validate the diagnostic performance of adrenal washout CT in patients without known malignancy in a Western Australian population.
methodsA radiology information system (RIS) search for CT reports containing "adrenal" and "washout" across six networked metropolitan public hospitals between January 2005 and November 2021. Homogenous nodules ≥ 1 cm, ≥ 10 HU without a suspected functional component in patients without a history of malignancy were included. Reported absolute and relative washout percentages were recorded and re-measured from unenhanced, 60-s portal venous and 15-min delayed phase imaging and compared to either histopathological or CT follow up for growth (≥ 12 months) reference standards.
results2653 studies were screened with 191 meeting inclusion criteria. 105 nodules underwent washout CT and then had either histopathological (12 patients) or CT follow up (93 patients) reference standards available. Reported absolute washout (aWO) estimated sensitivity and specificity for malignant/indeterminate nodules was low at 33% (95% CI 25-43%) and 77% (95% CI 68-84%) respectively. Reported relative washout (rWO) sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95% CI 46-65%) and 69% (95% CI 60-77%) respectively. Negative predictive values for both aWO and rWO were reassuring at 92% (95% CI 86-96%) and 94% (95%CI 88-97%).
conclusionOur study validates a recent report suggesting that adrenal washout has poor sensitivity for and consequent limited utility to exclude malignancy in patients with no cancer history. However, patients with incidental adrenal nodules < 4 cm in size with benign washout can be reassured by the high negative predictive value and worked up to exclude functional adenoma and re-imaged in a year to confirm no growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.