Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38772935›Full record

Trial reportInternational orthopaedics2024

The clinical efficacy of Medial Sustain Nail(MSN) and Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA) for fixation of medial comminuted trochanteric fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Shaobo Nie, Jiantao Li, Xiao Liu, Jianheng Liu, Xiaoyong Wu, Peifu Tang, Yanpeng Zhao, Ming Li, Licheng Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01437176 (Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture With New Type of Intramedullary Nail), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01437176 naunknown statusnot on this map

Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fracture With New Type of Intramedullary Nail

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeifu TangRan2011 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsIntertrochanteric FractureArmsnew type of intramedullary nail, The intramedullary nail of PFNA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shaobo Nie *Department of Orthopaedics, The First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Jiantao Li *National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing, 100853, China.
Xiao Liu *National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing, 100853, China.
Jianheng LiuNational Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing, 100853, China.
Xiaoyong WuDepartment of Orthopaedics, The First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Peifu TangNational Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing, 100853, China.
Yanpeng ZhaoNational Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing, 100853, China. zhaoyanpeng301@163.com.
Ming LiNational Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing, 100853, China. liming891215@163.com.
Licheng ZhangNational Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation, Beijing, 100853, China. zhanglcheng218@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of the Medial Sustain Nail (MSN) for medial comminuted trochanteric fractures fixation in comparison to Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) through a clinical study.

methodsA non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted at a single centre between July 2019 and July 2020. Fifty patients diagnosed comminuted trochanteric fractures were randomly assigned to either the MSN group (n = 25) or the PFNA group (n = 25). A total of forty-three patients were included in the final study analysis. The primary outcome measure was Short Form 36 health surgery physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) score. Secondary outcomes included the Oxford Hip Scores (OHS), weight bearing, complication relate to implant and so on. This study was not blined to surgeons, but to patients and data analysts.

resultsThe MSN demonstrated significantly better functional outcomes as measured by SF-36 PCS and OHS at six months postoperative compared to PFNA (p < 0.05). Union of fractures in the MSN group reached 90.9% at three months after surgery, whereas the PFNA group achieved a union rate of 57.1% (p < 0.05). Furthermore, weight-bearing time of MSN group was earlier than PFNA group (p < 0.05). Additionally, complications related to implant usage were more prevalent in the PFNA group (33.3%) compared to the MSN group (4.5%) (p < 0.05).

conclusionMSN exhibited superior quality of life outcomes compared to PFNA at six months postoperative. This indicates that MSN effectively reconstructs medial femoral support in patients with comminuted trochanteric fractures, which facilitates early weight-bearing and accelerates the recovery process.

trial registrationTrial registration number: NCT01437176, Date of the trial registration:2011-9-1, Date of commencement of the study:2011-9, Date of enrolment/recruitment of the study subjects:2019-7.

Indexed as

Bone NailsFractures, ComminutedHip FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeClinical efficacyComminuted trochanteric fracturesMedial supportMedical sustain nailProximal femoral nail anti-rotation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.