Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38772424›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Pervasive relaxed selection in termite genomes.

Kyle M Ewart, Simon Y W Ho, Al-Aabid Chowdhury, Frederick R Jaya, Yukihiro Kinjo, Juno Bennett, Thomas Bourguignon, Harley A Rose, Nathan Lo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genome Evolution in Social Insects.Genome biology and evolution · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Uncovering thousands of endosymbiont DNA transfer events within single cockroach genomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pervasive relaxed selection in termite genomes.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kyle M EwartSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0871-3369
Simon Y W HoSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Al-Aabid ChowdhurySchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Frederick R JayaEcology & Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4019-7026
Yukihiro KinjoOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan.
Juno BennettSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Thomas BourguignonOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4035-8977
Harley A RoseSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nathan LoSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2176-2840

Funding

Australian Research Council Discovery DP220103265Australian Research Council Discovery FT160100463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic changes that enabled the evolution of eusociality have long captivated biologists. More recently, attention has focussed on the consequences of eusociality on genome evolution. Studies have reported higher molecular evolutionary rates in eusocial hymenopteran insects compared with their solitary relatives. To investigate the genomic consequences of eusociality in termites, we analysed nine genomes, including newly sequenced genomes from three non-eusocial cockroaches. Using a phylogenomic approach, we found that termite genomes have experienced lower rates of synonymous substitutions than those of cockroaches, possibly as a result of longer generation times. We identified higher rates of non-synonymous substitutions in termite genomes than in cockroach genomes, and identified pervasive relaxed selection in the former (24-31% of the genes analysed) compared with the latter (2-4%). We infer that this is due to reductions in effective population size, rather than gene-specific effects (e.g. indirect selection of caste-biased genes). We found no obvious signature of increased genetic load in termites, and postulate efficient purging of deleterious alleles at the colony level. Additionally, we identified genomic adaptations that may underpin caste differentiation, such as genes involved in post-translational modifications. Our results provide insights into the evolution of termites and the genomic consequences of eusociality more broadly.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectIsopteraSelection, GeneticAnimalsCockroachesEvolution, MolecularPhylogenySocial BehaviorBlattodeaeffective population sizeeusocialityindirect selectionphylogenomicsrelaxed selection

Identifiers

PMID38772424
PMCPMC11285798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.