Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38772123›Full record

ArticleNuclear medicine and biology

[

Kaytlyn C McNeal, Kirsten M Reeves, Patrick N Song, Suzanne E Lapi, Anna G Sorace, Benjamin M Larimer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nuclear medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Challenges in tracer development for tumor microenvironment (TME) imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kaytlyn C McNealDepartment of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America; Graduate Biomedical Science Program, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Kirsten M ReevesDepartment of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America; Graduate Biomedical Science Program, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Patrick N SongDepartment of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America; Graduate Biomedical Science Program, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Suzanne E LapiDepartment of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Anna G SoraceDepartment of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Benjamin M LarimerDepartment of Radiology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America; O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America. Electronic address: blarimer@uab.edu.

Funding

XRAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA013148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert S Welner · 1985 to 2026
$165.9M
Utilization of Immuno-PET to detect response and guide novel oHSV-based therapy for gliomaR01CA279143 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI JAMES M MARKERT, Anna C Sorace · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Site-Specific Immune Cell Activation Detection for Improving Individualized Cancer ImmunotherapyDP2CA261453 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LARIMER, BENJAMIN M · 2020 to 2020
$2.2M
Personalizing immunotherapy in HER2+ breast cancer through quantitative imagingR01CA240589 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SORACE, ANNA C · 2020 to 2023
$1.6M
Mathematical modeling and molecular imaging to maximize response while minimizing toxicities from systemic therapies in preclinical models of breast cancerR01CA276540 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SORACE, ANNA C, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2023 to 2025
$1.4M
Quantitative PET Imaging for Oncologic Immune Response PredictionR00CA215604 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LARIMER, BENJAMIN M · 2019 to 2021
$703k
NCI NIH HHS DP2 CA261453NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013148NCI NIH HHS R00 CA215604NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240589NCI NIH HHS R01 CA276540NCI NIH HHS R01 CA279143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextHypoxia within the tumor microenvironment is a critical factor influencing the efficacy of immunotherapy, including immune checkpoint inhibition. Insufficient oxygen supply, characteristic of hypoxia, has been recognized as a central determinant in the progression of various cancers. The reemergence of evofosfamide, a hypoxia-activated prodrug, as a potential treatment strategy has sparked interest in addressing the role of hypoxia in immunotherapy response. This investigation sought to understand the kinetics and heterogeneity of tumor hypoxia and their implications in affecting responses to immunotherapeutic interventions with and without evofosfamide. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the influence of hypoxia on immune checkpoint inhibition, evofosfamide monotherapy, and their combination on colorectal cancer (CRC). Employing positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, we developed novel analytical methods to quantify and characterize tumor hypoxia severity and distribution. PROCEDURES: Murine CRC models were longitudinally imaged with [

findingsSevere hypoxia significantly impeded immunotherapy effectiveness consistent with an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Hypoxia-specific PET imaging revealed a striking degree of spatial heterogeneity in tumor hypoxia, with some regions exhibiting significantly more severe hypoxia than others. The study identified FMISOmax as a robust predictor of immunotherapy response, emphasizing the impact of localized severe hypoxia on tumor volume control during therapy. Interestingly, evofosfamide did not directly reduce hypoxia but markedly improved the response to immunotherapy, uncovering an alternative mechanism for its efficacy.

conclusionsThese results enhance our comprehension of the interplay between hypoxia and immune checkpoint inhibition within the tumor microenvironment, offering crucial insights for the development of personalized cancer treatment strategies. Non-invasive hypoxia quantification through molecular imaging evaluating hypoxia severity may be an effective tool in guiding treatment planning, predicting therapy response, and ultimately improving patient outcomes across diverse cancer types and tumor microenvironments. It sets the stage for the translation of these findings into clinical practice, facilitating the optimization of immunotherapy regimens by addressing tumor hypoxia and thereby enhancing the efficacy of cancer treatments.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMisonidazolePositron-Emission TomographyTumor HypoxiaAnimalsCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleMiceTumor MicroenvironmentfluoromisonidazoleImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMisonidazoleCancerEvofosfamideImmunotherapyPredictive biomarkerResponse predictionTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID38772123
PMCPMC11180552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.