ArticleAnnals of surgery2025
Extracellular Vesicle- MDM2 -DNA as a Potential Liquid Biopsy Biomarker for Disease Identification in Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma.
Article in Annals of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular Vesicles in Cancer: Biomarkers, Mechanisms, and Emerging Diagnostic Technologies.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Tumorigenesis of well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma: 12q amplicon architecture, oncogenic cargo, and evolutionary progression.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Long-term survival with eribulin in an elderly patient with inoperable retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Circulating Biomarkers in Sarcoma.Current oncology reports · 2025Review
- The independent prognostic nomogram models for primary and recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a population-based cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to assess the levels of MDM2 -DNA within extracellular vesicles (EVs) isolated from the serum of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLS) patients versus healthy donors, as well as within the same patients at the time of surgery versus postoperative surveillance visits. To determine whether EV- MDM2 may serve as a possible first-ever biomarker of liposarcoma recurrence.
backgroundA hallmark of well-differentiated and dedifferentiated (WD/DD) retroperitoneal liposarcoma is elevated MDM2 due to genome amplification, with recurrence rates of >50% even after complete resection. Imaging technologies frequently cannot resolve recurrent WD/DD-RLS versus postoperative scarring. Early detection of recurrent lesions, for which biomarkers are lacking, would guide surveillance and treatment decisions.
methodsWD/DD-RLS serum samples were collected both at the time of surgery and during follow-up visits from 42 patients, along with sera from healthy donors (n=14). EVs were isolated, DNA purified, and MDM2 -DNA levels determined through q-PCR analysis. Nonparametric tests were employed to compare EV- MDM2 DNA levels from patients versus the control group, as well as the time of surgery versus postsurgery conditions.
resultsEV -MDM2 levels were significantly higher in WD/DD-RLS than controls ( P =0.00085). Moreover, EV- MDM2 levels were remarkably decreased in WD/DD-RLS patients after resection ( P =0.00036), reaching values comparable to control group ( P =0.124). During postoperative surveillance, significant increases of EV- MDM2 were observed in some patients, correlating with computed tomography scan evidence of recurrent or persistent postresection disease.
conclusionsSerum EV- MDM2 may serve as a potential biomarker of early recurrent or postoperatively persistent WD/DD-RLS, a disease currently lacking such determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.