Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771858›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Characterization of bacteria expectorated during forced salivation of the Phlebotomus papatasi: A neglected component of sand fly infectious inoculums.

Naseh Maleki-Ravasan, Seyedeh Maryam Ghafari, Narmin Najafzadeh, Fateh Karimian, Fatemeh Darzi, Roshanak Davoudian, Reza Farshbaf Pourabad, Parviz Parvizi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular screening forFrontiers in microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naseh Maleki-RavasanDepartment of Parasitology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-7209-5908
Seyedeh Maryam GhafariDepartment of Parasitology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Narmin NajafzadehDepartment of Parasitology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Fateh KarimianDepartment of Parasitology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh DarziDepartment of Parasitology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Roshanak DavoudianDepartment of Parasitology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Reza Farshbaf PourabadDepartment of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, İzmir, Türkiye.
Parviz ParviziDepartment of Parasitology, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

Pasteur Institute of Iran
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The infectious inoculum of a sand fly, apart from its metacyclic promastigotes, is composed of factors derived from both the parasite and the vector. Vector-derived factors, including salivary proteins and the gut microbiota, are essential for the establishment and enhancement of infection. However, the type and the number of bacteria egested during salivation is unclear. In the present study, sand flies of Phlebotomus papatasi were gathered from three locations in hyperendemic focus of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis (ZCL) in Isfahan Province, Iran. By using the forced salivation assay and targeting the 16S rRNA barcode gene, egested bacteria were characterized in 99 (44%) out of 224 sand flies. Culture-dependent and culture-independent methods identified the members of Enterobacter cloacae and Spiroplasma species as dominant taxa, respectively. Ten top genera of Spiroplasma, Ralstonia, Acinetobacter, Reyranella, Undibacterium, Bryobacter, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium, Psychrobacter, and Wolbachia constituted >80% of the saliva microbiome. Phylogenetic analysis displayed the presence of only one bacterial species for the Spiroplasma, Ralstonia, Reyranella, Bryobacter and Wolbachia, two distinct species for Cutibacterium, three for Undibacterium and Psychrobacter, 16 for Acinetobacter, and 27 for Corynebacterium, in the saliva. The abundance of microbes in P. papatasi saliva was determined by incorporating the data on the read counts and the copy number of 16S rRNA gene, about 9,000 bacterial cells, per sand fly. Both microbiological and metagenomic data indicate that bacteria are constant companions of Leishmania, from the intestine of the vector to the vertebrate host. This is the first forced salivation experiment in a sand fly, addressing key questions on infectious bite and competent vectors.

Indexed as

BacteriaPhlebotomusPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalivaAnimalsFemaleInsect VectorsIranLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMaleMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID38771858
PMCPMC11108182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.