Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771823›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Assessing the impact of CHARM2, a family planning program on gender attitudes, intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and marital quality in India.

Sangeeta Chatterji, Nicole E Johns, Mohan Ghule, Shahina Begum, Sarah Averbach, Madhusudana Battala, Anita Raj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sangeeta ChatterjiSchool of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5836-514X
Nicole E JohnsCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4513-4582
Mohan GhuleCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Shahina BegumICMR-National Institute for Research in Reproductive and Child Health, Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5590-2210
Sarah AverbachCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1924-7770
Madhusudana BattalaPopulation Council, New Delhi, India.
Anita RajCenter on Gender Equity and Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.

Funding

Enhancing male participation in interventions to prevent unintended pregnancyR01HD084453 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI RAJ, ANITA · 2017 to 2021
$2.8M
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation INV-002967NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a two-armed cluster randomised controlled trial, CHARM2 (Counselling Husbands to Achieve Reproductive health and Marital equity), a 5-session gender equity and family planning intervention for couples in rural India, showed an impact on family planning outcomes in primary trial analyses. This study examines its effects on gender-equitable attitudes, intimate partner violence, reproductive coercion, and marital quality. We used multilevel mixed-effects models to assess the intervention impact on each outcome. Both male (aIRR at 9 months: 0.64, C.I.: 0.45,0.90; aIRR at 18 months: 0.25, C.I.: 0.18,0.39) and female (aIRR at 9 months: 0.57, C.I.: 0.46,0.71; aIRR at 18 months: 0.38, C.I.: 0.23,0.61) intervention participants were less likely than corresponding control participants to endorse attitudes accepting physical IPV at 9- and 18-month follow-ups. Men in the intervention, compared to those in the control condition, reported more gender-equitable attitudes at 9- and 18 months (ß at 9 months: 0.13, C.I.: 0.06,0.20; ß at 18 months: 0.26, C.I.: 0.19,0.34) and higher marital quality at the 18-month follow-up (ß: 0.03, C.I.: 0.01,0.05). However, we found no effects on women's experiences of IPV, reproductive coercion, or marital quality. CHARM2 shows promise in improving men's and women's attitudes towards gender equality and male perceptions of marital quality. Still, IPV and reproductive coercion reductions may require more intensive programming than that provided within this 5-session model focused on family planning.

Identifiers

PMID38771823
PMCPMC11108161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.