Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771819›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

"If I am alive, I am happy": Defining quality of care from the perspectives of key maternal and newborn health stakeholders in Papua New Guinea.

Lachlan M Faktor, Alyce N Wilson, Pele Melepia, Delly Babona, Pinip Wapi, Rose Suruka, Priscah Hezeri, Duk Duk Kabiu, Lisa M Vallely, Elissa Kennedy and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lachlan M FaktorMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, International Development, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6801-5210
Alyce N WilsonMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, International Development, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Pele MelepiaHealthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Program, Burnet Institute, Kokopo, Papua New Guinea.
Delly BabonaMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, International Development, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Pinip WapiNonga General Hospital, Rabaul, Papua New Guinea.
Rose SurukaHealthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Program, Burnet Institute, Kokopo, Papua New Guinea.
Priscah HezeriHealthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Program, Burnet Institute, Kokopo, Papua New Guinea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8272-7614
Duk Duk KabiuHealthy Mothers, Healthy Babies Program, Burnet Institute, Kokopo, Papua New Guinea.
Lisa M VallelyPapua New Guinea Institute for Medical Research, Goroka, Papua New Guinea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8247-7683
Elissa KennedyMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, International Development, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Michelle J L ScoullarMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, International Development, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Naomi SpotswoodMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, International Development, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Caroline S E HomerMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, International Development, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-3011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quality maternal and newborn healthcare is essential to improve experiences and health outcomes for mothers and babies. In many low to middle income countries, such as Papua New Guinea, there are initiatives to increase antenatal care attendance and facility births. To develop and implement initiatives that are appropriate, relevant, and contextualised to a community, it is important to understand how quality of care is perceived and defined by different maternal and newborn healthcare stakeholders. The aim of this study was to understand how women, their partners, healthcare professionals, healthcare managers, and provincial health administrators in East New Britain, Papua New Guinea define quality of pregnancy, childbirth, and immediate postnatal care. An exploratory qualitative study underpinned by a partnership-defined quality approach was undertaken. In total, 42 participants from five different healthcare facilities in East New Britain, Papua New Guinea, were interviewed. These included women, partners, healthcare professionals, healthcare managers, and provincial health administrators. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis, assisted by NVivo computer software. Four themes were identified aligning with the journey a woman takes throughout the health system. These included (I) Ensuring Access: Arriving at the health centre, (II) Experiencing Positive Care: What the staff do, (III) Having the Bare Minimum: Resources available to the service, and (IV) Meeting Expectations: Outcomes of care. Stakeholder groups had significant overlap in how quality of care was defined, however women and partners focussed more on elements relating to experience of care, while clinical stakeholders focussed on elements relating to provision of care. There is a gap in how stakeholders define quality maternal and newborn healthcare, and the quality of the care which is administered and received.

Identifiers

PMID38771819
PMCPMC11108204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.