ArticlePloS one2024
Automatic quantification of tumor-stroma ratio as a prognostic marker for pancreatic cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatially resolved tissue architecture and computational pathology in pancreatic cancer.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Pathomics Signature for Prognosis and CA19-9 Interception in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Real-Life, Multi-Center Study.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Article
- The Heterogeneity and Function of Stromal Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Automated tumor stroma ratio assessment in colorectal cancer using hybrid deep learning approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Prognostic Roles of β-Catenin Expression and Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Pancreatic Cancer: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy vs. Upfront Surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Quantitative and qualitative metrics of tumor stroma in predicting ovarian cancer outcomes and expansion of its study with AI-based tools.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - time for a reality check.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to introduce an innovative multi-step pipeline for automatic tumor-stroma ratio (TSR) quantification as a potential prognostic marker for pancreatic cancer, addressing the limitations of existing staging systems and the lack of commonly used prognostic biomarkers.
methodsThe proposed approach involves a deep-learning-based method for the automatic segmentation of tumor epithelial cells, tumor bulk, and stroma from whole-slide images (WSIs). Models were trained using five-fold cross-validation and evaluated on an independent external test set. TSR was computed based on the segmented components. Additionally, TSR's predictive value for six-month survival on the independent external dataset was assessed.
resultsMedian Dice (inter-quartile range (IQR)) of 0.751(0.15) and 0.726(0.25) for tumor epithelium segmentation on internal and external test sets, respectively. Median Dice of 0.76(0.11) and 0.863(0.17) for tumor bulk segmentation on internal and external test sets, respectively. TSR was evaluated as an independent prognostic marker, demonstrating a cross-validation AUC of 0.61±0.12 for predicting six-month survival on the external dataset.
conclusionOur pipeline for automatic TSR quantification offers promising potential as a prognostic marker for pancreatic cancer. The results underscore the feasibility of computational biomarker discovery in enhancing patient outcome prediction, thus contributing to personalized patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.