Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771746›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of neuron models with ion concentration dynamics.

Letizia Signorelli, Andrea Manzoni, Marte J Sætra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Letizia SignorelliDepartment of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-1834-7793
Andrea ManzoniMOX, Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Marte J SætraDepartment of Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing, Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7225-1883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive and computationally efficient case study for uncertainty quantification (UQ) and global sensitivity analysis (GSA) in a neuron model incorporating ion concentration dynamics. We address how challenges with UQ and GSA in this context can be approached and solved, including challenges related to computational cost, parameters affecting the system's resting state, and the presence of both fast and slow dynamics. Specifically, we analyze the electrodiffusive neuron-extracellular-glia (edNEG) model, which captures electrical potentials, ion concentrations (Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Cl-), and volume changes across six compartments. Our methodology includes a UQ procedure assessing the model's reliability and susceptibility to input uncertainty and a variance-based GSA identifying the most influential input parameters. To mitigate computational costs, we employ surrogate modeling techniques, optimized using efficient numerical integration methods. We propose a strategy for isolating parameters affecting the resting state and analyze the edNEG model dynamics under both physiological and pathological conditions. The influence of uncertain parameters on model outputs, particularly during spiking dynamics, is systematically explored. Rapid dynamics of membrane potentials necessitate a focus on informative spiking features, while slower variations in ion concentrations allow a meaningful study at each time point. Our study offers valuable guidelines for future UQ and GSA investigations on neuron models with ion concentration dynamics, contributing to the broader application of such models in computational neuroscience.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeuronsAction PotentialsAnimalsHumansIonsMembrane PotentialsNeurogliaUncertaintyIons

Identifiers

PMID38771746
PMCPMC11108148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.