ArticleActa neurochirurgica2024
Cryopreserved bone flaps from decompressive craniectomies: a microbiological analysis.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSurgical site infection (SSI) is a serious complication after cranioplasty. Due to the relatively frequent occurrence of post-cranioplasty SSI, the utility of autologous bone flap swab cultures surrounding cryopreservation as a reliable predictor has been the subject of an ongoing debate. This bicentric study aims to contribute to this topic by conducting an in-depth analysis of bone flaps obtained via decompressive craniectomies. This study had three major aims: assessments of 1) bacterial contamination of bone flaps after decompressive craniotomy, 2) impact of cryoconservation on contamination rates and 3) potential effectiveness of anti-infective treatment to reduce the germ load prior to cranioplasty.
methodsCryopreserved bone flaps from two centers were used. Microbiological cultivations of swabs prior to and after cryopreservation were taken and assessed for aerobic and anaerobic growth over a 14-day incubation period. Additionally, in a subset of bone flaps, swab testing was repeated after thorough rinsing with an anti-infectant (octenidine-phenoxyethanol) followed by saline.
resultsAll 63 bone flaps (patients median age at surgery: 59 years) were obtained via decompressive craniectomies. Swabs done prior to cryopreservation revealed a 54% infection rate with Propionibacterium acnes being the most common microorganism in 65% of those cases. After thorough disinfection of the preserved bone flaps, all but one case showed no bacterial growth in swab testing. Furthermore, no relevant risk factors for bacterial contamination could be identified.
conclusionThis retrospective study showed the common presence of bacterial growth in cryopreserved bone flaps before and after freezing. Rinsing with octenidine-phenoxyethanol and saline effectively prevented bacterial growth in a notable percentage of cases, suggesting a potential strategy to reduce contamination. However, persistent bacterial growth in some cases underscores the need for further research to optimize antiseptic measures during autologous cranioplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38771556What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.