Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771507›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2025

Application of deep learning algorithms in classification and localization of implant cutout for the postoperative hip.

Jin Rong Tan, Yan Gao, Raghavan Raghuraman, Daniel Ting, Kang Min Wong, Lionel Tim-Ee Cheng, Hong Choon Oh, Siang Hiong Goh, Yet Yen Yan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jin Rong TanDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore General Hospital, Block 2, Level 1 Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore. Tan.jin.rong@singhealth.com.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1849-4865
Yan GaoHealth Services Research, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4279-1595
Raghavan RaghuramanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Daniel TingDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore Health Service (SingHealth), Singapore, Singapore.
Kang Min WongRadiological Sciences ACP, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Lionel Tim-Ee ChengDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore General Hospital, Block 2, Level 1 Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1068-7868
Hong Choon OhHealth Services Research, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3086-7516
Siang Hiong GohDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yet Yen YanRadiological Sciences ACP, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5537-8575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to explore the feasibility of employing convolutional neural networks for detecting and localizing implant cutouts on anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe research involves the development of two Deep Learning models. Initially, a model was created for image-level classification of implant cutouts using 40191 pelvic radiographs obtained from a single institution. The radiographs were partitioned into training, validation, and hold-out test datasets in a 6/2/2 ratio. Performance metrics including the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated using the test dataset. Additionally, a second object detection model was trained to localize implant cutouts within the same dataset. Bounding box visualizations were generated on images predicted as cutout-positive by the classification model in the test dataset, serving as an adjunct for assessing algorithm validity.

resultsThe classification model had an accuracy of 99.7%, sensitivity of 84.6%, specificity of 99.8%, AUROC of 0.998 (95% CI: 0.996, 0.999) and AUPRC of 0.774 (95% CI: 0.646, 0.880). From the pelvic radiographs predicted as cutout-positive, the object detection model could achieve 95.5% localization accuracy on true positive images, but falsely generated 14 results from the 15 false-positive predictions.

conclusionThe classification model showed fair accuracy for detection of implant cutouts, while the object detection model effectively localized cutout. This serves as proof of concept of using a deep learning-based approach for classification and localization of implant cutouts from pelvic radiographs.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHip ProsthesisSensitivity and SpecificityAgedAlgorithmsArthroplasty, Replacement, HipFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis FailureRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceDeep learningImplant cutoutOrthopaedic implantPelvis radiograph

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.