Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771490›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2024

Impact of positive end-expiratory pressure on renal resistive index in mechanical ventilated patients.

Alberto Fogagnolo, Salvatore Grasso, Elena Morelli, Francesco Murgolo, Rosa Di Mussi, Luigi Vetrugno, Riccardo La Rosa, Carlo Alberto Volta, Savino Spadaro

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03969914 (PEEP-induced Changed in RRI as Physiological Background of Ventilator-induced Kidney Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03969914 completednot on this map

PEEP-induced Changed in RRI as Physiological Background of Ventilator-induced Kidney Injury

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversità degli Studi di FerraraRan2019 to 2020Enrolled105ConditionsRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult, Respiration, Artificial, Acute Kidney InjuryArmsPEEP changes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alberto Fogagnolo *Department of Translational medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Sant' Anna, University of Ferrara, 8, Aldo Moro 44121, Ferrara, Italy. alberto.fogagnolo@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2737-0162
Salvatore Grasso *Dipartimento dell'Emergenza e Trapianti d'Organo (DETO), Sezione di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0287-0232
Elena MorelliIntensive Care Unit, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Maternity and Infant, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Francesco MurgoloDipartimento dell'Emergenza e Trapianti d'Organo (DETO), Sezione di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1014-3016
Rosa Di MussiDipartimento dell'Emergenza e Trapianti d'Organo (DETO), Sezione di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università degli Studi di Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Luigi VetrugnoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-8368
Riccardo La RosaDepartment of Translational medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Sant' Anna, University of Ferrara, 8, Aldo Moro 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
Carlo Alberto VoltaDepartment of Translational medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Sant' Anna, University of Ferrara, 8, Aldo Moro 44121, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3533-6121
Savino SpadaroDepartment of Translational medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Sant' Anna, University of Ferrara, 8, Aldo Moro 44121, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5027-5318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGrowing evidence shows the complex interaction between lung and kidney in critically ill patients. The renal resistive index (RRI) is a bedside measurement of the resistance of the renal blood flow and it is correlated with kidney injury. The positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level could affect the resistance of renal blood flow, so we assumed that RRI could help to monitoring the changes in renal hemodynamics at different PEEP levels. Our hypothesis was that the RRI at ICU admission could predict the risk of acute kidney injury in mechanical ventilated critically ill patients.

methodsWe performed a prospective study including 92 patients requiring mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h. A RRI ≥ 0.70, was deemed as pathological. RRI was measured within 24 h from ICU admission while applying 5,10 and 15 cmH

resultsOverall, RRI increased from 0.62 ± 0.09 at PEEP 5 to 0.66 ± 0.09 at PEEP 15 (p < 0.001). The mean RRI value during the PEEP trial was able to predict the occurrence of AKI with AUROC = 0.834 [95%CI 0.742-0.927]. Patients exhibiting a RRI ≥ 0.70 were 17/92(18%) at PEEP 5, 28/92(30%) at PEEP 10, 38/92(41%) at PEEP 15, respectively. Thirty-eight patients (41%) exhibited RRI ≥ 0.70 at least once during the PEEP trial. In these patients, AKI occurred in 55% of the cases, versus 13% remaining patients, p < 0.001.

conclusionsRRI seems able to predict the risk of AKI in mechanical ventilated patients; further, RRI values are influenced by the PEEP level applied.

trial registrationClinical gov NCT03969914 Registered 31 May 2019.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCritical IllnessKidneyPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialAdultAgedFemaleHemodynamicsHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRenal CirculationVascular ResistanceAcute kidney injuryCritical careDoppler ultrasoundPositive end-expiratory pressureRenal hemodynamics

Identifiers

PMID38771490
PMCPMC11427533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.