Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771460›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2024

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Four-Point Scleral Intraocular Lens Fixation and the Yamane Technique.

Natalia Błagun, Karolina Krix-Jachym, Marek Rękas

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06389643 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Four-Point Scleral Intraocular Lens Fixation and Yamane Techniques

TypeinterventionalSponsorMilitary Institute od Medicine National Research InstituteRan2021 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsAphakiaArmsFour-point scleral fixation of Akreos AO60 IOL, Sutureless scleral fixation of AcrySof MA60AC IOL with Yamane technique
NCT07446829 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Different Needle Insertion Positions on the Clinical Outcomes of YAMANE Technique for Intrascleral Intraocular Lens Fixation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled54ConditionsCongenital Ectopia LentisArmsYAMANE technique(Suture Needle Insertion at 2.5 mm Posterior to the Limbus)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Real-world outcomes of scleral-fixated intraocular lens: a multi-surgeon study comparing four-point fixation and flanged intrascleral haptic fixation techniques.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalia BłagunOphthalmology Department, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute, Szaserów Street 128, 04-141, Warsaw, Poland. nblagun@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4549-9637
Karolina Krix-JachymOphthalmology Department, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute, Szaserów Street 128, 04-141, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8493-7762
Marek RękasOphthalmology Department, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute, Szaserów Street 128, 04-141, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0429-6649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of our study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two scleral fixation intraocular lens (IOL) methods of four-point scleral fixation (Akreos AO60) and the Yamane technique (AcrySof MA60AC).

methodsThis prospective, randomized study was conducted at the Military Institute of Medicine-National Research Institute in Warsaw between 2021 and 2023. We compared both groups for cause of aphakia, ocular history, refractive status, and complication.

resultsOur study included 50 eyes from 47 patients. Four-point fixation was performed in 25 eyes (group 1), and the Yamane technique was used in 25 eyes (group 2). Surgical time was 24.1 min ± 8.9 in group 1 and 25.1 min ± 9.9 in group 2 (p > 0.05). The postoperative BCVA (best-corrected visual acuity) for group 1 and group 2 at 1 year's observation was 0.10 ± 0.15 and 0.09 ± 0.17 logMAR, respectively (p > 0.05). Postoperative total refractive error (RE) was - 0.06 ± 0.71 diopters (D) for four-point scleral fixation and 0.83 ± 0.70 D for Yamane technique (p < 0.05). Endothelial cell density (ECD) loss was 0.9% in group 1 and 3.5% in group 2 (p > 0.05). Bleeding into the anterior chamber and vitreous body was more frequent in the group of patients operated on with the use of the Yamane technique (10 cases, 20%, p = 0.01). IOL displacement was found in one case (2%) in group 2.

conclusionsBoth analyzed techniques are well tolerated and ensure good refractive results (extremely predictable in four-point scleral fixation) and have a similar safety profile. Four-point scleral fixation of IOL would appear to be safe, effective and beneficial for young, active patients, especially after trauma or recurrent subluxation. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06389643.

Indexed as

AphakiaFour-point scleral fixationScleral fixation IOLSutureless fixation IOLYamane technique

Identifiers

PMID38771460
PMCPMC11178701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.