ArticleJournal of hematopathology2024
Validation of an automated iron stain process for use with bone marrow aspirate smear slides.
Article in Journal of hematopathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of bone marrow iron stores is typically performed on an aspirate smear slide that has been manually stained by a technologist using a commercially available kit. This approach can contribute to inconsistent results and limit the broad use of iron staining in bone marrow specimens, particularly when laboratories have low staffing and/or high specimen volumes. Here, we describe the adaptation and validation of the Ventana Benchmark automated stainer and iron stain kit for routine clinical use of staining iron in bone marrow aspirate smear slides. We assessed accuracy and precision of the Ventana automated iron staining protocol compared to the Perls Prussian blue manual iron staining index method. Hematopathologists assigned Gale scores and enumerated the percentages of erythroid sideroblasts on paired patient bone marrow aspirate smear slides stained by the automated method and the manual iron staining method. We found a similar level of performance of the Ventana automated iron stain relative to the index manual method (as assessed by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses). In addition, there was low imprecision between replicates performed via the automated iron stain protocol. We also report superior qualitative findings of the automated method in ease of localization of iron storage, visualization of sideroblasts, and counterstain consistency. Automated iron staining of bone marrow aspirate smear slides performed similarly to the manual method and may allow for accurate routine evaluation of bone marrow iron stores as part of bone marrow analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38771403What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.