Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771334›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2024

Residual networks without pooling layers improve the accuracy of genomic predictions.

Zhengchao Xie, Xiaogang Xu, Ling Li, Cuiling Wu, Yinxing Ma, Jingjing He, Sidi Wei, Jun Wang, Xianzhong Feng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhengchao XieZhejiang Laboratory, Hangzhou, 311100, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5886-4053
Xiaogang XuSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, 310012, China. xxgang2013@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2991-6077
Ling LiZhejiang Laboratory, Hangzhou, 311100, China.
Cuiling WuZhejiang Laboratory, Hangzhou, 311100, China.
Yinxing MaZhejiang Laboratory, Hangzhou, 311100, China.
Jingjing HeZhejiang Laboratory, Hangzhou, 311100, China.
Sidi WeiZhejiang Laboratory, Hangzhou, 311100, China.
Jun WangZhejiang Laboratory, Hangzhou, 311100, China.
Xianzhong FengKey Laboratory of Soybean Molecular Design Breeding, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130102, China.

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 2023YFD1202600Intelligent Technology and Platform Development for Rice Breeding of Zhejiang Lab 2021PE0AC05Soybean Intelligent Computational Breeding and Application of Zhejiang Lab 2021PE0AC04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageResidual neural network genomic selection is the first GS algorithm to reach 35 layers, and its prediction accuracy surpasses previous algorithms. With the decrease in DNA sequencing costs and the development of deep learning, phenotype prediction accuracy by genomic selection (GS) continues to improve. Residual networks, a widely validated deep learning technique, are introduced to deep learning for GS. Since each locus has a different weighted impact on the phenotype, strided convolutions are more suitable for GS problems than pooling layers. Through the above technological innovations, we propose a GS deep learning algorithm, residual neural network for genomic selection (ResGS). ResGS is the first neural network to reach 35 layers in GS. In 15 cases from four public data, the prediction accuracy of ResGS is higher than that of ridge-regression best linear unbiased prediction, support vector regression, random forest, gradient boosting regressor, and deep neural network genomic prediction in most cases. ResGS performs well in dealing with gene-environment interaction. Phenotypes from other environments are imported into ResGS along with genetic data. The prediction results are much better than just providing genetic data as input, which demonstrates the effectiveness of GS multi-modal learning. Standard deviation is recommended as an auxiliary GS evaluation metric, which could improve the distribution of predicted results. Deep learning for GS, such as ResGS, is becoming more accurate in phenotype prediction.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenomicsNeural Networks, ComputerPhenotypeDeep LearningGene-Environment InteractionModels, GeneticSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.