Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771329›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2024

The role of PSMA PET/CT in predicting downgrading in patients with Gleason score 4+4 prostate cancer in prostate biopsy.

Ibrahim Can Aykanat, Yakup Kordan, Hulya Seymen, Ersin Koseoglu, Arif Ozkan, Baris Esen, Kayhan Tarim, Ibrahim Kulac, Okan Falay, Bengi Gurses and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ibrahim Can AykanatDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Zeytinburnu, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey. canaykanat89@gmail.com.
Yakup KordanDepartment of Urology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hulya SeymenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ersin KoseogluDepartment of Urology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Arif OzkanDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Zeytinburnu, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey.
Baris EsenDepartment of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Zeytinburnu, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey.
Kayhan TarimDepartment of Urology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ibrahim KulacDepartment of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Okan FalayDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bengi GursesDepartment of Radiology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Dilek Ertoy BaydarDepartment of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abdullah Erdem CandaDepartment of Urology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mevlana Derya BalbayDepartment of Urology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet Onur DemirkolDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tarik EsenDepartment of Urology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the predictable parameters associated with downgrading in patients with a Gleason score (GS) 8 (4+4) in prostate biopsy after radical prostatectomy.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 62 patients with a GS of 4+4 on prostate biopsy who underwent robotic radical prostatectomy between 2017 and 2022.

results38 of 62 (61.2%) were downgraded. In multivariable logistic regression model, Ga-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) SUV max was independent predictor of downgrading (OR 0.904; p = 0.011) and a Logistic Regression model was constructed using the following formula: Y = 1.465-0.95 (PSMA PET/CT SUV max). The model using this variable correctly predicted the downgrading in 72.6% of patients. The AUC for PSMA PET/CT SUV max was 0.709 the cut off being 8.8. A subgroup analysis was performed in 37 patients who had no other European Association of Urology (EAU) high risk features. 25 out of 37 (67.5%) were downgraded, and 21 of these 25 had organ confined disease. Low PSMA SUV max (<8.1) and percentage of GS 4+4 biopsy cores to cancer bearing cores (45.0%) were independently associated with downgrading to GS 7.

conclusionPSMA PET/CT can be used to predict downgrading in patients with GS 4+4 PCa. Patients with GS 4+4 disease, but no other EAU high risk features, low percentage of GS 4+4 biopsy cores to cancer bearing cores, and a low PSMA PET/CT SUV max are associated with a high likelihood of the cancer reclassification to intermediate risk group.

Indexed as

Neoplasm GradingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAntigens, SurfaceBiopsyGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProstateRetrospective StudiesAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIDowngradingGleason score 8High riskProstate cancerPSMA PET CT

Identifiers

PMID38771329
PMCPMC11108863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.