Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771177›Full record

ArticleRadiology2024

Patient Characteristics Impact Performance of AI Algorithm in Interpreting Negative Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Studies.

Derek L Nguyen, Yinhao Ren, Tyler M Jones, Samantha M Thomas, Joseph Y Lo, Lars J Grimm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Derek L Nguyen *From the Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 10 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710 (D.L.N., J.Y.L., L.J.G.); Pratt School of Engineering (Y.R.) and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (T.M.J., S.M.T.), Duke University, Durham, NC; and iCAD, Nashua, NC (Y.R.).ORCID 0000-0001-9991-5611
Yinhao Ren *From the Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 10 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710 (D.L.N., J.Y.L., L.J.G.); Pratt School of Engineering (Y.R.) and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (T.M.J., S.M.T.), Duke University, Durham, NC; and iCAD, Nashua, NC (Y.R.).ORCID 0000-0003-0729-5000
Tyler M JonesFrom the Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 10 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710 (D.L.N., J.Y.L., L.J.G.); Pratt School of Engineering (Y.R.) and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (T.M.J., S.M.T.), Duke University, Durham, NC; and iCAD, Nashua, NC (Y.R.).ORCID 0009-0007-5004-2136
Samantha M ThomasFrom the Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 10 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710 (D.L.N., J.Y.L., L.J.G.); Pratt School of Engineering (Y.R.) and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (T.M.J., S.M.T.), Duke University, Durham, NC; and iCAD, Nashua, NC (Y.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-1561-9303
Joseph Y LoFrom the Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 10 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710 (D.L.N., J.Y.L., L.J.G.); Pratt School of Engineering (Y.R.) and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (T.M.J., S.M.T.), Duke University, Durham, NC; and iCAD, Nashua, NC (Y.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-9540-5072
Lars J GrimmFrom the Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, 10 Duke Medicine Cir, Durham, NC 27710 (D.L.N., J.Y.L., L.J.G.); Pratt School of Engineering (Y.R.) and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (T.M.J., S.M.T.), Duke University, Durham, NC; and iCAD, Nashua, NC (Y.R.).ORCID 0000-0002-3865-3352

Funding

Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONNA NIEDZWIECKI · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to manage radiologists' workloads. The impact of patient characteristics on AI performance has not been well studied. Purpose To understand the impact of patient characteristics (race and ethnicity, age, and breast density) on the performance of an AI algorithm interpreting negative screening digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) examinations. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort study identified negative screening DBT examinations from an academic institution from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. All examinations had 2 years of follow-up without a diagnosis of atypia or breast malignancy and were therefore considered true negatives. A subset of unique patients was randomly selected to provide a broad distribution of race and ethnicity. DBT studies in this final cohort were interpreted by a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved AI algorithm, which generated case scores (malignancy certainty) and risk scores (1-year subsequent malignancy risk) for each mammogram. Positive examinations were classified based on vendor-provided thresholds for both scores. Multivariable logistic regression was used to understand relationships between the scores and patient characteristics. Results A total of 4855 patients (median age, 54 years [IQR, 46-63 years]) were included: 27% (1316 of 4855) White, 26% (1261 of 4855) Black, 28% (1351 of 4855) Asian, and 19% (927 of 4855) Hispanic patients. False-positive case scores were significantly more likely in Black patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5 [95% CI: 1.2, 1.8]) and less likely in Asian patients (OR = 0.7 [95% CI: 0.5, 0.9]) compared with White patients, and more likely in older patients (71-80 years; OR = 1.9 [95% CI: 1.5, 2.5]) and less likely in younger patients (41-50 years; OR = 0.6 [95% CI: 0.5, 0.7]) compared with patients aged 51-60 years. False-positive risk scores were more likely in Black patients (OR = 1.5 [95% CI: 1.0, 2.0]), patients aged 61-70 years (OR = 3.5 [95% CI: 2.4, 5.1]), and patients with extremely dense breasts (OR = 2.8 [95% CI: 1.3, 5.8]) compared with White patients, patients aged 51-60 years, and patients with fatty density breasts, respectively. Conclusion Patient characteristics influenced the case and risk scores of a Food and Drug Administration-approved AI algorithm analyzing negative screening DBT examinations. © RSNA, 2024.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsMammographyAdultAgedBreastBreast DensityFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38771177
PMCPMC11140531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.