ArticleAnalytical chemistry2024
Multi-Parameter Analysis of Nanoplastics in Flow: Taking Advantage of High Sensitivity and Time Resolution Enabled by Stimulated Raman Scattering.
Article in Analytical chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Aquatic Pollution to Drinking-Water Exposure: Analytical Challenges in Detecting Nanoplastics in Drinking Water-A PRISMA-Guided Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Molecular Fingerprinting for Source Attribution of Nanoplastics in Drinking-Water Systems.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- PlasticAnalytics: A Deep Learning-Powered Spectral Library and Analytical Suite.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Flow Raman Spectroscopy for the Detection and Identification of Small Microplastics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Here, we demonstrate the detection of nanoplastics (NPLs) in flow with stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) for the first time. NPLs (plastic particles <1000 nm) have recently been detected in different environmental samples and personal care products. However, their characterization is still an analytical challenge. Multiple parameters, including size, chemical composition, and concentration (particle number and mass), need to be determined. In an earlier paper, online field flow fractionation (FFF)-Raman analysis with optical trapping was shown to be a promising tool for the detection of particles in this size range. SRS, which is based on the enhancement of a vibrational transition by the matching energy difference of two laser beams, would allow for much more sensitive detection and, hence, much shorter acquisition times compared to spontaneous Raman microspectroscopy (RM). Here, we show the applicability of SRS for the flow-based analysis of individual, untrapped NPLs. It was possible to detect polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) beads with diameters of 100-5000 nm. The high time resolution of 60.5 μs allows us to detect individual signals per particle and to correlate the number of detected particles to the injected mass concentration. Furthermore, due to the high time resolution, optically trapped beads could be distinguished from untrapped beads by their peak shapes. The SRS wavenumber settings add chemical selectivity to the measurement. Whereas optical trapping is necessary for the flow-based detection of particles by spontaneous RM, the current study demonstrates that SRS can detect particles in a flow without trapping. Additionally, the mean particle size could be estimated using the mean width (duration) and intensity of the SRS signals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.