Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38771040›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology resource announcements2024

Metatranscriptomes of California grassland soil microbial communities in response to rewetting.

Peter F Chuckran, Katerina Estera-Molina, Marcel Huntemann, Brian Foster, Simon Roux, Supratim Mukherjee, Patrick Hajek, T B K Reddy, Chris Daum, I-Min A Chen and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology resource announcements, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Codon bias, nucleotide selection, and genome size predict in situ bacterial growth rate and transcription in rewetted soil.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Peter F ChuckranDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8015-0479
Katerina Estera-MolinaDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Marcel HuntemannDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1284-3748
Brian FosterDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
Simon RouxDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
Supratim MukherjeeDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6322-2271
Patrick HajekDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
T B K ReddyDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0871-5567
Chris DaumDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3895-5892
I-Min A ChenDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2026-9798
Christa PennacchioDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.
Emiley A Eloe-FadroshDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8162-1276
Paul DijkstraCenter for Ecosystem Science and Society (ECOSS) and Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA.
Mary K FirestoneDepartment of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4289-3244
Steven J BlazewiczPhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.
Jennifer Pett-RidgePhysical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4439-2398

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC02-05CH11231U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-AC52-07NA27344U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0016247U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) DE-SC0020163U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) SCW1421U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) SCW1589U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) SCW1632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When very dry soil is rewet, rapid stimulation of microbial activity has important implications for ecosystem biogeochemistry, yet associated changes in microbial transcription are poorly known. Here, we present metatranscriptomes of California annual grassland soil microbial communities, collected over 1 week from soils rewet after a summer drought-providing a time series of short-term transcriptional response during rewetting.

Indexed as

biogeochemistrymetatranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID38771040
PMCPMC11237402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.