Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38770813›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2024

A rapid review of the evidence on models of service delivery for correctional centre-based mothers and children's units: does our approach need to change?

Jo Taylor, Tazeen Majeed, Marc Remond, Tanmay Bagade, Layla Edwards, Kelly Austin, Emma Smith, Mark Howard, Elizabeth Sullivan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jo TaylorThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9258-1372
Tazeen MajeedThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Marc RemondThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Tanmay BagadeThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Layla EdwardsUniversity of Technology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kelly AustinCorrective Services New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emma SmithCorrective Services New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark HowardCorrective Services New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth SullivanThe University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia e.sullivan@newcastle.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncarcerated mothers are a marginalised group who experience substantial health and social disadvantage and routinely face disruption of family relationships, including loss of custody of their children. To support the parenting role, mothers and children's units (M&Cs) operate in 97 jurisdictions internationally with approximately 19 000 children reported to be residing with their mothers in custody-based settings.

aimThis rapid review aims to describe the existing evidence regarding the models of service delivery for, and key components of, custodial M&Cs.

methodA systematic search was conducted of four electronic databases to identify peer-reviewed literature published from 2010 onwards that reported quantitative and qualitative primary studies focused on custody-based M&Cs. Extracted data included unit components, admission and eligibility criteria, evaluations and recommendations.

resultsOf 3075 records identified, 35 met inclusion criteria. M&Cs accommodation was purpose-built, incorporated elements of domestic life and offered a family-like environment. Specific workforce training in caring for children and M&Cs evaluations were largely absent. Our systematic synthesis generated a list of key components for M&C design and service delivery. These components include timely and transparent access to information and knowledge for women, evaluation of the impact of the prison environment on M&C, and organisational opportunities and limitations.

conclusionThe next generation of M&Cs requires evidence-based key components that are implemented systematically and is evaluated. To achieve this, the use of codesign is a proven method for developing tailored programmes. Such units must offer a net benefit to both mothers and their children.

Indexed as

MothersChildChild CustodyCorrectional FacilitiesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansModels, OrganizationalPrisonersPrisonsChild healthHealth policyMaternal healthPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID38770813
PMCPMC11085710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.