Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38770772›Full record

ArticleWomen's health (London, England)

Women's trust in the healthcare system in Serbia: Validation of the Women's Trust and Confidence in Healthcare System scale.

Milica Ninković, Sandra Ilić, Kaja Damnjanović

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Milica NinkovićLaboratory for Research of Individual Differences, Department of Psychology and Institute of Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0003-4294-1426
Sandra IlićLaboratory for Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Kaja DamnjanovićLaboratory for Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0002-9254-1263

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen's role as patients is associated with power relationships embedded in society. Although trust in the health care system is a general prerequisite for positive health outcomes, practices regarding women's agency in healthcare systems in Southeastern Europe reinforce women's passivity. Most of the current psychological measures of trust have been constructed and validated in "WEIRD" (samples that are drawn from populations that are White, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) countries, thus having a limited application in other social contexts.

objectivesWe aimed to construct an instrument for assessing women's trust in healthcare systems to describe the structure of trust: Women's Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale.

designTwo independent samples (N

methodsWe used exploratory factor analysis of the Women's Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale to analyze the structure of trust in the first sample data set and validated it with the second sample using confirmatory factor analysis. We tested concurrent validity by exploring how women's trust in the healthcare system predicts health-related behaviors (multigroup structural equation modeling). All analyses were conducted using R statistical software.

resultsThe Women's Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86) indicated a three-factor structure of trust in the healthcare system: trust in healthcare professionals, distrust in the public healthcare system, and confidence in healthcare system. This was validated using an independent sample. Interpersonal trust positively predicted women's desirable health behaviors, while trust in the system had a negative impact.

conclusionThe Women's Trust and Confidence in the Healthcare System scale captures women's trust in a paternalistic healthcare system, is reliable, and has a stable three-factor structure. The study's findings reveal the relationship between women's trust and health-related behavior: in paternalistic environments, trust reinforces women's passivity.

Indexed as

TrustAdultDelivery of Health CareFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSerbiaSurveys and QuestionnairesWomen's HealthYoung Adultpaternalistic modelpatients’ agencytrust in healthcare providerstrust in the healthcare systemWITCH scalewomen’s health-related behavior

Identifiers

PMID38770772
PMCPMC11127576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.