Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38770736›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

A fear conditioned cue orchestrates a suite of behaviors in rats.

Amanda Chu, Nicholas T Gordon, Aleah M DuBois, Christa B Michel, Katherine E Hanrahan, David C Williams, Stefano Anzellotti, Michael A McDannald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A Shared Threat-Anticipation Circuit Is Dynamically Engaged at Different Moments by Certain and Uncertain Threat.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amanda ChuDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5590-3245
Nicholas T GordonDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Aleah M DuBoisDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Christa B MichelDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Katherine E HanrahanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States.
David C WilliamsDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Stefano AnzellottiDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States.
Michael A McDannaldDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8525-1260

Funding

Early life stress, neuron-type function and a raphe-amygdala circuit for threat estimationR01MH117791 · NIMH · BOSTON COLLEGE · PI MCDANNALD, MICHAEL A · 2018 to 2025
$4.0M
NIH HHS MH117791NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pavlovian fear conditioning has been extensively used to study the behavioral and neural basis of defensive systems. In a typical procedure, a cue is paired with foot shock, and subsequent cue presentation elicits freezing, a behavior theoretically linked to predator detection. Studies have since shown a fear conditioned cue can elicit locomotion, a behavior that - in addition to jumping, and rearing - is theoretically linked to imminent or occurring predation. A criticism of studies observing fear conditioned cue-elicited locomotion is that responding is non-associative. We gave rats Pavlovian fear discrimination over a baseline of reward seeking. TTL-triggered cameras captured 5 behavior frames/s around cue presentation. Experiment 1 examined the emergence of danger-specific behaviors over fear acquisition. Experiment 2 examined the expression of danger-specific behaviors in fear extinction. In total, we scored 112,000 frames for nine discrete behavior categories. Temporal ethograms show that during acquisition, a fear conditioned cue suppresses reward seeking and elicits freezing, but also elicits locomotion, jumping, and rearing - all of which are maximal when foot shock is imminent. During extinction, a fear conditioned cue most prominently suppresses reward seeking, and elicits locomotion that is timed to shock delivery. The independent expression of these behaviors in both experiments reveals a fear conditioned cue to orchestrate a temporally organized suite of behaviors.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalConditioning, ClassicalCuesFearAnimalsExtinction, PsychologicalLocomotionMaleRatsethogramfearfreezingjumpingneurosciencePavlovianratthreat

Identifiers

PMID38770736
PMCPMC11219038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.