ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Error modelled gene expression analysis (EMOGEA) provides a superior overview of time course RNA-seq measurements and low count gene expression.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Augmented kurtosis-based projection pursuit: a novel, advanced machine learning approach for multi-omics data analysis and integration.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Temporal RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) studies of bulk samples provide an opportunity for improved understanding of gene regulation during dynamic phenomena such as development, tumor progression or response to an incremental dose of a pharmacotherapeutic. Moreover, single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data implicitly exhibit temporal characteristics because gene expression values recapitulate dynamic processes such as cellular transitions. Unfortunately, temporal RNA-seq data continue to be analyzed by methods that ignore this ordinal structure and yield results that are often difficult to interpret. Here, we present Error Modelled Gene Expression Analysis (EMOGEA), a framework for analyzing RNA-seq data that incorporates measurement uncertainty, while introducing a special formulation for those acquired to monitor dynamic phenomena. This method is specifically suited for RNA-seq studies in which low-count transcripts with small-fold changes lead to significant biological effects. Such transcripts include genes involved in signaling and non-coding RNAs that inherently exhibit low levels of expression. Using simulation studies, we show that this framework down-weights samples that exhibit extreme responses such as batch effects allowing them to be modeled with the rest of the samples and maintain the degrees of freedom originally envisioned for a study. Using temporal experimental data, we demonstrate the framework by extracting a cascade of gene expression waves from a well-designed RNA-seq study of zebrafish embryogenesis and an scRNA-seq study of mouse pre-implantation and provide unique biological insights into the regulation of genes in each wave. For non-ordinal measurements, we show that EMOGEA has a much higher rate of true positive calls and a vanishingly small rate of false negative discoveries compared to common approaches. Finally, we provide two packages in Python and R that are self-contained and easy to use, including test data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.