Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38770599›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental science2024

Comparison of speech and music input in North American infants' home environment over the first 2 years of life.

Lindsay Hippe, Victoria Hennessy, Naja Ferjan Ramirez, T Christina Zhao

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Active Infant's Developing Role in Musical Interactions: Insights From an Online Parent Questionnaire.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
  6. Parental Social and Musical Characteristics, the Home Music Environment, and Child Language Development in Infancy.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lindsay HippeInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Victoria HennessyInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Naja Ferjan RamirezInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
T Christina ZhaoInstitute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1165-909X

Funding

Neural mechanisms underlying the sensitive period for phonetic learning in infants at-risk for Developmental Language DisorderR01DC020419 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Tian Christina Zhao · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants are immersed in a world of sounds from the moment their auditory system becomes functional, and experience with the auditory world shapes how their brain processes sounds in their environment. Across cultures, speech and music are two dominant auditory signals in infants' daily lives. Decades of research have repeatedly shown that both quantity and quality of speech input play critical roles in infant language development. Less is known about the music input infants receive in their environment. This study is the first to compare music input to speech input across infancy by analyzing a longitudinal dataset of daylong audio recordings collected in English-learning infants' home environments, at 6, 10, 14, 18, and 24 months of age. Using a crowdsourcing approach, 643 naïve listeners annotated 12,000 short snippets (10 s) randomly sampled from the recordings using Zooniverse, an online citizen-science platform. Results show that infants overall receive significantly more speech input than music input and the gap widens as the infants get older. At every age point, infants were exposed to more music from an electronic device than an in-person source; this pattern was reversed for speech. The percentage of input intended for infants remained the same over time for music while that percentage significantly increased for speech. We propose possible explanations for the limited music input compared to speech input observed in the present (North American) dataset and discuss future directions. We also discuss the opportunities and caveats in using a crowdsourcing approach to analyze large audio datasets. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://youtu.be/lFj_sEaBMN4 RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: This study is the first to compare music input to speech input in infants' natural home environment across infancy. We utilized a crowdsourcing approach to annotate a longitudinal dataset of daylong audio recordings collected in North American home environments. Our main results show that infants overall receive significantly more speech input than music input. This gap widens as the infants get older. Our results also showed that the music input was largely from electronic devices and not intended for the infants, a pattern opposite to speech input.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentMusicSpeechAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleNorth AmericaSpeech Perceptionauditory environmentcrowdsourcinginfancyLENAmusic inputspeech input

Identifiers

PMID38770599
PMCPMC12313026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.