ArticleCureus2024
Metastatic Gastric Tumors: Clinical and Endoscopic Features.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synchronous Gastric Metastasis From Sigmoid Colon Cancer: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Challenges in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer with intramural gastric metastasis: Two case reports.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStomach metastasis is rare, and there are few reports on its endoscopic features. Herein, we focused on the endoscopic features and discussed and reviewed the clinicopathological characteristics of metastatic gastric tumors.
methodsWe conducted an analysis on the clinicopathological features of individuals with gastric metastases originating from solid organ tumors at the Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan. Thirty-one cases were identified and evaluated for histology, initial presentation, endoscopic findings, lesion locations, treatment courses, and overall survival of the patients.
resultsEndoscopic findings resembling submucosal tumors were present in five cases (16%), and those with a morphology similar to that of primary gastric cancer were present in 26 cases (84%). In addition, seven patients (22%) were diagnosed with gastric metastasis due to a suspected biopsy of early gastric cancer. Solitary metastasis (21 patients, 67.7%) was more common than multiple metastases (10 patients, 32.2%). The median time from primary tumor to diagnosis was 36 months, and survival after metastasis was 19 months. The overall survival (OS) after the diagnosis of the primary tumor was 22 months for esophageal cancer, 25 months for lung cancer, and 100 months for breast cancer, and the OS after the diagnosis of gastric metastasis was almost the same. The average time from the diagnosis of the primary tumor to the diagnosis of gastric metastasis (*timespan) was more than seven years for breast and kidney cancers.
conclusionAs the prognosis of patients with cancer gradually improves, they develop metastases more frequently. Understanding the endoscopic findings and information about a patient's clinical history is useful to correctly diagnose gastric metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.