ArticleCureus2024
Genetic and Clinical Characteristics of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy With Steroid Use.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hormonal factors in the pathophysiology of central serous chorioretinopathy - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Association of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy With Endogenous or Exogenous Corticosteroids: A Report of 2 Cases.JCEM case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the genetic and clinical characteristics of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) in patients with and without steroid use.
methodsA total of 407 consecutive patients with CSC were included. Demographic data and clinical factors, including subfoveal choroidal thickness, bilateral involvement, descending tracts, pachydrusen, fibrin, and dome-shaped pigment epithelial detachment, were obtained. Variants of complement factor H (CFH)
resultsOf the total patients, 48 (11.8%) were steroid users. The majority of males were non-steroid users (82.5%) than steroid users (58.3%) (p = 9.8 × 10
conclusionsExcept for the male/female ratio, there were no significant differences in the clinical presentation or genetic characteristics, including variants of the CFH gene, between the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.