Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38770422›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Student Nurses' Perceptions of the Role of High-Fidelity Simulation in Developing Decision-Making Skills for Clinical Practice: A Qualitative Research Study.

Naim Abdulmohdi, Andrew McVicar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Naim AbdulmohdiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3818-965X
Andrew McVicarSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Education, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The integration of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) in nursing education has increased, but its effect on students' clinical decision-making skills and their ability to transfer these skills to clinical practice remains unclear. Aim: This qualitative study aimed to explore nursing students' perceptions of simulation's role in developing decision-making skills for clinical practice. Methods: Twenty-three self-selected final-year nursing students participated in an HFS exercise in 2016. They engaged in "think-aloud" activities during the simulation, reviewed videos of their performance, and attended a structured debriefing session. Four to six weeks later, face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted to gather their views on the application of learning from simulation into practice. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the interview data. Results: Four themes emerged from the analysis: "enhancing clinical decision-making skills," "recognition of the types of clinical decision-making," "recognition of cognitive biases," and "transferability and integrating theory into practice." Simulation improved student self-awareness, decision-making skills, and recognition of cognitive biases applied in practice. Overall, students found that the simulation improved their ability to apply theoretical knowledge gained through simulation to practice. The students' perception of the authenticity of activities in relation to real-world scenarios played a crucial role in enhancing the transferability and application of acquired knowledge from simulation to clinical practice. Conclusion: The findings provide valuable insights into how simulation optimizes learning and decision-making skills, ultimately promoting effective care in clinical settings.

Indexed as

nursing educationnursing studentsother-zero levelqualitative researchresearch

Identifiers

PMID38770422
PMCPMC11104027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.