ArticleHeliyon2024
Feasibility of rib fracture detection in low-dose computed tomography images with a large, multicenter datasets-based model.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Rib Fracture on X-ray and Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A Benchmark X-ray Dataset for Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures with Improved YOLOv11-Based Detection.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Automatic rib fracture detection on postmortem CT data using deep learning.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- AI for Lesion Detection in Musculoskeletal Radiology.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of rib fracture detection in low-dose computed tomography (CT) images with a RetinaNet-based approach and to evaluate the potential of lowdose CT for rib fracture detection compared with regular-dose CT images. Materials and methods: The RetinaNet-based deep learning model was trained using 7300 scans with 50,410 rib fractures that were used as internal training datasets from four multicenter. The external test datasets consisted of both regular-dose and low-dose chest-abdomen CT images of rib fractures; the MICCAI 2020 RibFrac Challenge Dataset was used as the public dataset. Radiologists' interpretations were used as reference standards. The performance of the model in rib fracture detection was compared with the radiologists' interpretation. Results: In total, 728 traumatic rib fractures of 100 patients [60 men (60 %); mean age, 53.45 ± 11.19 (standard deviation (SD)); range, 18-77 years] were assessed in the external datasets. In these patients, the regular-dose group had a mean CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) of 7.18 mGy (SD: 2.22) and a mean dose length product (DLP) of 305.38 mGy cm (SD: 95.31); the low-dose group had a mean CTDIvol of 2.79 mGy (SD: 1.11) and a mean DLP of 131.52 mGy cm (SD: 55.58). The sensitivity of the RetinaNet-based model and that of the radiologists was 0.859 and 0.721 in the low-dose CT images and 0.886 and 0.794 in the regular-dose CT images, respectively. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the RetinaNet-based model can detect rib fractures in low-dose CT images with a robust performance, indicating its feasibility in assisting radiologists with rib fracture diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.