Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38770179›Full record

ReviewAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Review of Recent Improvements in Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Glioblastoma.

Fereshteh Koosha, Mahdieh Ahmadikamalabadi, Mohadesseh Mohammadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Relative biological effectiveness and neural stem cell fate in carbon ion-irradiated human brain organoids.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Advancing Cancer-Targeted Nanotherapies with Tumor Homing Peptides.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fereshteh KooshaDepartment of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mahdieh AhmadikamalabadiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.
Mohadesseh MohammadiDepartment of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This article provides an overview of the physical and biologic properties of carbon ions, followed by an examination of the latest clinical outcomes in patients with glioma who have received carbon ion radiation therapy. Methods and Materials: According to thee articles that have been reviewed, glioma represents the predominant form of neoplastic growth in the brain, accounting for approximately 51% of all malignancies affecting the nervous system. Currently, high-grade glioma, specifically glioblastoma, comprises 15% of cases and is associated with a high mortality rate. The development of novel drugs for the treatment of high-grade tumors has been impeded by various factors, such as the blood-brain barrier and tumor heterogeneity, despite numerous endeavors. According to the definition of tumor grade established by the World Health Organization, the conventional treatment involves surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Despite numerous attempts in photon radiation therapy to apply the highest possible dose to the tumor site while minimizing damage to healthy tissue, there has been no success in increasing patient survival. The primary cause of resistance to conventional radiation therapy methods, namely x-ray and gamma-ray, is attributed to the survival of radio-resistant glioma stem cells, which have the potential to trigger a recurrence of tumors. Particle beams, such as protons and carbon ions, can deposit the highest dose to a confined region, thus offering a more accurate dose distribution compared with photon beams. Results: Carbon ions exhibit higher linear energy transfer and relative biologic effectiveness compared with photons, potentially enabling them to overcome radio-resistant tumor cells. Conclusions: Therefore, it can be hypothesized that carbon ion radiation therapy may show superior efficacy in destroying neoplastic cells with reduced negative outcomes compared with x-ray radiation therapy.

Identifiers

PMID38770179
PMCPMC11103612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.