ArticleFrontiers in chemical biology2024
An
Article in Frontiers in chemical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal in vivo imaging reveals asynchronous, incomplete Nipah virus clearance with prolonged focal CNS involvement in IFNAREmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- De novo recovery of Ghana virus, an African bat Henipavirus, reveals differential tropism and attenuated pathogenicity compared to Nipah virus.Cell reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of Recombinant Cedar Virus Infection and Cross-Protection Against Related Henipaviruses in African Green Monkeys.Viruses · 2026Article
- Current knowledge on the host-pathogen interactions of henipaviruses and novel platforms to enable further characterisation.EBioMedicine · 2026Review
- A recombinant Cedar virus preclinical model that recapitulates neurological features of henipavirus disease.iScience · 2025Article
- Henipaviruses: epidemiology, ecology, disease, and the development of vaccines and therapeutics.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Article
- Cedar virus biology and its applications as a surrogate for highly pathogenic henipaviruses.Cell insight · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Henipaviruses are enveloped single-stranded, negative-sense RNA viruses of the paramyxovirus family. Two henipaviruses, Nipah virus and Hendra virus, cause a systemic respiratory and/or neurological disease in humans and ten additional species of mammals, with a high fatality rate. Because of their highly pathogenic nature, Nipah virus and Hendra virus are categorized as BSL-4 pathogens, which limits the number and scope of translational research studies on these important human pathogens. To begin to address this limitation, we are developing a BSL-2 model of authentic henipavirus infection in mice, using the non-pathogenic henipavirus, Cedar virus. Notably, wild-type mice are highly resistant to Hendra virus and Nipah virus infection. However, previous work has shown that mice lacking expression of the type I interferon receptor (IFNAR-KO mice) are susceptible to both viruses. Here, we show that luciferase-expressing recombinant Cedar virus (rCedV-luc) is also able to replicate and establish a transient infection in IFNAR-KO mice, but not in wild-type mice. Using longitudinal bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of luciferase expression, we detected rCedV-luc replication as early as 10 h post-infection. Viral replication peaks between days 1 and 3 post-infection, and declines to levels undetectable by BLI by 7 days post-infection. Immunohistochemistry is consistent with viral infection and replication in endothelial cells and other non-immune cell types within tissue parenchyma. Serology analyses demonstrate significant IgG responses to the Cedar virus surface glycoprotein with potent neutralizing activity in IFNAR-KO mice, whereas antibody responses in wild-type animals were non-significant. Overall, these data suggest that rCedV-luc infection of IFNAR-KO mice represents a viable platform for the study of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.