ReviewFrontiers in medicine2024
Complications of XEN gel stent implantation for the treatment of glaucoma: a systematic review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of XEN gel stent for management of open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PeerJ · 2026Pooled it
- Tube obstruction caused by blood clots following PreserFlo MicroShunt surgery.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Enabling adaptability and hydraulic resistance in minimally invasive glaucoma surgery using an architecture-driven approach.iScience · 2026Article
- Three-Year Outcomes and Safety of the XEN63 Gel Stent: A Multicenter Prospective Study in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Update on XEN Gel Stent: A Narrative Review on Indications, Surgical Technique, and Postoperative Management.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- One-Year Outcomes of Repeat XEN Gel Stent Implantation for Prior XEN Failure: A Retrospective Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Novel Non-Valved Glaucoma Drainage Device with Reduced Inner Lumen Diameter: 6-Month Safety and Efficacy Outcomes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Persistent Macular Choroidal Folds without Hypotony Following XEN Gel Stent Implantation: A Case Report.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2025Article
- Gels as Promising Delivery Systems: Physicochemical Property Characterization and Recent Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Update on Surgical Techniques Best Practices to Optimize Outcomes Following Gel Stent Implantation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study was aimed to summarize the complications and their management associated with XEN gel stent implantation. Methods: A systematic review of literature was conducted using Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library databases, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, from their inception to February 1, 2024. Results: A total of 48 studies published between 2017 and 2024 were identified and included in the systematic review, including 16 original studies (retrospective or prospective clinical studies), 28 case reports, and 4 case series, which followed patients for up to 5 years. Early postoperative complications of XEN gel stent implantation include hypotony maculopathy (1.9-4.6%), occlusion (3.9-8.8%), suprachoroidal hemorrhage (SCH), choroidal detachment (0-15%), conjunctival erosion, and exposure of the XEN gel stent (1.1-2.3%), wound and bleb leaks (2.1%) and malignant glaucoma (MG) (2.2%). Mid-postoperative complications of XEN gel stent implantation included migration of XEN (1.5%), ptosis (1.2%), endophthalmitis (0.4-3%), macular edema (1.5-4.3%), hypertrophic bleb (8.8%) and subconjunctival XEN gel stent fragmentation (reported in 2 cases). Late postoperative complications reported in cases included spontaneous dislocation and intraocular degradation. Conclusion: XEN gel stent implantation is a minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) procedure for glaucoma, known for its potential to minimize tissue damage and reduce surgical duration. However, it is crucial to note that despite these advantages, there remains a risk of severe complications, including endophthalmitis, SCH, and MG. Therefore, postoperative follow-up and early recognition of severe complications are essential for surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.