Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38770044›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2024

Dissemination innovation: Using found poetry to return study results to patients and partners facing cancer.

Sara G Bybee, Jacqueline Eaton, Bob Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara G BybeeUniversity of Utah College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America.
Jacqueline EatonUniversity of Utah College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America.
Bob WongUniversity of Utah College of Nursing, 10 S 2000 E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, United States of America.

Funding

CTSA Postdoctoral T32 at University of Utah: Spheres of Translation Across the Research Spectrum (STARS) Training ProgramT32TR004394 · NCATS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANGELA FAGERLIN, Keke Celeste Fairfax · 2023 to 2026
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS T32 TR004394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Investigators should return study results to patients and families facing cancer to honor their research contributions. We created a found poem from transcripts of sexual and gender minority (SGM) couples facing cancer and returned it to study participants. Methods: Participants were randomized to receive the found poem in text, text and audio, audio, or video format, completed dissemination preferences and emotion questionnaires, and open-ended questions about their experience receiving the poem. Results: Participants preferred the format they received ( Conclusion: Innovative approaches to dissemination are acceptable; providing choices in how and when participants receive results may increase engagement; and SGM versus non-SGM groups may describe dyadic experiences differently. Innovation: Returning study results via found poetry is an innovative way to honor research participants facing cancer.

Indexed as

CancerDisseminationFound poemLGBTQ+PoetrySexual and gender minority

Identifiers

PMID38770044
PMCPMC11103570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.